Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Xbox and Playstation to Block Used Games


Wyank

Recommended Posts

Xbox Link

Additionally, a "reliable industry source" tells Kotaku that Microsoft's Next Xbox may incorporate a system that blocks gamers from playing used titles. Further details concerning the implementation of such a system were not offered.

PS3 Link

Buckle up, Sony enthusiasts. A tipster has told Kotaku that the PlayStation 4 is named "Orbis" and that it will feature an anti-used-game system, offer no backward compatibility with PlayStation 3 titles, and ship in holiday 2013. As for the first part of the rumor, multiple sources told the blog that the Orbis will sport some sort of anti-used-game measure. Full Orbis games will be available via Blu-ray disc or as a PlayStation Network download and will be locked to a single PSN account. Players will not be able to circumvent the system by remaining offline, as the source said users will be forced to be connected to the PSN to boot up their games.

Both will require user to be always online to play games as well. Link above for next Sony product already states this.

Xbox Link

Gamers will need an Internet connection to play next-generation Xbox titles, if a report proves accurate. VG247 cites sources who claim the next Xbox will require a constant Internet connection as a method of fighting piracy. No further information concerning this was offered.

There's other info on the systems coming out like 720 will come with blue ray drive and kinect 2. Expected release dates of holiday season of 2013. But the blocking of used games might be a deal breaker for me. I like buying used games. I like selling my new when bought games to get back some of that $60. Just not fond of where this is going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will kill their own business. The only way people stomach spending $60 on a game is to know they can recoup some of it towards a future purchase. I personally will stick with my ps3 because the best part is playing games when I don't have access to internet. Gamestop is going to die from this. Smaller local places will thrive selling old consoles and old games.

I've really become disgruntled with the entire gaming industry. It started as a bunch of nerds enjoying a passion. But those small nerd companies needed investments from big business and it became about money. I bought a used copy of ncaa 11' because it had Cam Newton in it. To gain online access was $10 because it was used. To open all of the features was going to be another $30. Opening features should be done by in game achievement, not money. There is nothing worse than realizing you just bought a bad game. That is why I rarely if ever buy games these days. If Nintendo really wants the Wii U to bring the company back to glory they should allow used games on their network. That will give them an edge they haven't had since the N64.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like selling my new when bought games to get back some of that $60.

The $60 price point drives me nuts because not all games are created equal. Madden has been running the same engine for 10 years. They tweak it a little each year but their development costs are very low compared to a stand alone game like Uncharted 1. I bought this Xmen Destiny game and it was a got damned joke. Any college kid could have made this game in his dorm room and it cost as much as an epic title like Zelda Skyward sword. A lower quality game should start at $20. You wouldn't pay the same price for New Balance as you would for Jordans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if you have to be online the entire time, what's to stop them from implementing a system that cuts off the ability to play older games, i.e. cutting off Madden 12 once Madden 13 comes out, etc? Not sure I'd put it past the companies at this point. The move towards "licensure" from "ownership" continues to have horrible implications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ultimately it's up to the other safety prospects to clearly outplay Scott. I think when that happens on tape against other teams it'll be addressed. I think none of them have done that definitively and consistently yet. 
    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
×
×
  • Create New...