Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think our logo is the meanest..

xclr82xtc

By xclr82xtc,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

xclr82xtc Newbie

xclr82xtc

Posted
Posted

now that i see them all in one place, i think we have the most threating looking logo.. i mean really, it looks mean... out of the ones that are supposed to look intimidating, i think we are number 1, but the broncos is definately a close second.

and yes, this is a "im bored at work thread" feel free to post rude, funny, and vulger comments. LOL

1)Panthers

2)Denver

3)Falcons

4)Seehawks

5)eagles

6) jaguars

7) rams

new-nike-carolina-panthers-helmet.jpg

post-3812-0-59599400-1342195934_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

I think the eyes in the Bronco make it look a little fiercer, but you could really interchange the two. I also would move the ram much higher up your list, and switch the Falcottonheadedninnymuggins and Seahawks...(also bored at work)....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Bwood

Guest Bwood

Posted
Posted

how do people make it in their adult life with such poor grammar? a typo is one thing but multiple misspellings in a 4 sentence post on a site with spell check is just pitiful.

I usually just assume it's a 16 year old that's got nothing to do now that summer has begun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest fug

Guest fug

Posted
Posted

how do people make it in their adult life with such poor grammar? a typo is one thing but multiple misspellings in a 4 sentence post on a site with spell check is just pitiful.

Please read my sig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • Martin
      fug the HATERS

      By Martin · Posted

      I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...