Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bye Bye AE?

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

I don't know how a guy who is a conditional late round pick which probably costs us little to nothing if he doesn't make the roster tells us anything about whether we dump a 3rd rounder from 2 seasons ago. We may dump Edwards for sure but not because of the trade. I think it tells us Gettis is slow to recover and we need some stop gap guys for this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
XClown1986 Proficient

XClown1986

Posted
Posted

More than likely. Murphy also provides better competition in camp than a handful of undrafted guys, makes guys like Gettis, Pilares, Tutu, AE and even Lafell work harder and get better. We needed a true threat to make the team for these guys to feel the pressure. None of the undrafted guys must have given off that vibe, at least not yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Rookie

teeray

Posted
Posted

Probably we are just adding competition at the WR spot. I think after Lafell and Smitty every WR on our roster needs to be sweating a little bit.

Whoever performs over the next month will be here. Whoever doesn't.... see gif above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KendrickPanther Apprentice

KendrickPanther

Posted
Posted

This doesn't even make sense to me. Why would we waste any pick for a guy like that. I felt like Kealoha and Joe Adams would take up spots. Kealoha could be in trouble now.

There is no reason to cut Armanti right now. Let him play through training camp, we don't gain anything by releasing him now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted

I don't know how a guy who is a conditional late round pick which probably costs us little to nothing if he doesn't make the roster tells us anything about whether we dump a 3rd rounder from 2 seasons ago. We may dump Edwards for sure but not because of the trade. I think it tells us Gettis is slow to recover and we need some stop gap guys for this season.

Considering AEs open market value....

Gettis may be slow to recover but they are also sold that AE is not an option going forward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...