Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Steve Smith was in Pepp's situation right now...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I couldn't really rate a top 3 wide receivers because there are at least 5 wr who just have different play style and thus may affect their stats, but this would be mine in no particular order.

1. Steve

2. Fitz

3. Andre Johns

4. Calvin Johnson

5. Moss or Reggie Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't really rate a top 3 wide receivers because there are at least 5 wr who just have different play style and thus may affect their stats, but this would be mine in no particular order.

1. Steve

2. Fitz

3. Andre Johns

4. Calvin Johnson

5. Moss or Reggie Wayne

The difference is year in and year out Smitty is the man. Reggie Wayne to me is second because of consistancy. Fitz 3 with both Johnsons and finally Moss. Moss is an upgraded T.O.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am not exactly sure if teams would be lining up or not, if Anquan Boldin and Braylon Edwards are any indication. It would probably depend on the compensation involved. It's not like Smitty's rep is golden around the league either.

Just food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you would probably disagree, but Smitty and Pep fit in with this organization like a hand in a glove. Anywhere else, they would be perceived as being overpaid, but that isn't necessarily the case here. We know what we've got, and the FO is willing to pay for their services (IMHO, as well they should).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smith is the 3rd best receiver in the league. Johnson is the best (I think), and Fitz is second. I don't get why so many people want to call Calvin Johnson one of the best in the league already. He sure has the tools, and could definitely get there...I just haven't seen him prove it yet.

I agree with the thread though. Smith would be a hotter commodity than Pepp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We would have had some picks for Smith just because of his consistence. He is always above 1000 yards even when we are a run first team. Pep on the other hand is a hot and cold player and IDK who defends him he takes plays off and thats why. The dude just dose not have the drive of greatness like Smith and others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smitty's great. Definitely top 5. But there is no doubt Fitzgerald is the best WR in the game today...

Definitely the flavor of the day, but does that actually make him #1, just because he burned us in a playoff game? Not positive on that one, the line is very small...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...