Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Steve Smith was in Pepp's situation right now...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I couldn't really rate a top 3 wide receivers because there are at least 5 wr who just have different play style and thus may affect their stats, but this would be mine in no particular order.

1. Steve

2. Fitz

3. Andre Johns

4. Calvin Johnson

5. Moss or Reggie Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't really rate a top 3 wide receivers because there are at least 5 wr who just have different play style and thus may affect their stats, but this would be mine in no particular order.

1. Steve

2. Fitz

3. Andre Johns

4. Calvin Johnson

5. Moss or Reggie Wayne

The difference is year in and year out Smitty is the man. Reggie Wayne to me is second because of consistancy. Fitz 3 with both Johnsons and finally Moss. Moss is an upgraded T.O.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am not exactly sure if teams would be lining up or not, if Anquan Boldin and Braylon Edwards are any indication. It would probably depend on the compensation involved. It's not like Smitty's rep is golden around the league either.

Just food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you would probably disagree, but Smitty and Pep fit in with this organization like a hand in a glove. Anywhere else, they would be perceived as being overpaid, but that isn't necessarily the case here. We know what we've got, and the FO is willing to pay for their services (IMHO, as well they should).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smith is the 3rd best receiver in the league. Johnson is the best (I think), and Fitz is second. I don't get why so many people want to call Calvin Johnson one of the best in the league already. He sure has the tools, and could definitely get there...I just haven't seen him prove it yet.

I agree with the thread though. Smith would be a hotter commodity than Pepp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We would have had some picks for Smith just because of his consistence. He is always above 1000 yards even when we are a run first team. Pep on the other hand is a hot and cold player and IDK who defends him he takes plays off and thats why. The dude just dose not have the drive of greatness like Smith and others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smitty's great. Definitely top 5. But there is no doubt Fitzgerald is the best WR in the game today...

Definitely the flavor of the day, but does that actually make him #1, just because he burned us in a playoff game? Not positive on that one, the line is very small...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...