Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason to start and Munnerlyn to play #2


Guest Bwood

Recommended Posts

We shall see... their OL at least needs to be average this year, if so Munn 1on1 with Williams and try to double VJax IF that run 1st, set up the pass turns out effective...

Nothing to sneeze at in that scenario... Obviously we'll find out on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants probably didn't think they would lose bc of the Ogletree Romo connection. I mean if you were game planning against this D....would you not put a heavy emphasis on the Williams/Captain matchup. Hope to find a way to get VJ on Captain in a dream scenario?

Giants probably didn't think Cruz would forget how to catch either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two predictions for the upcoming game and days following:

1) One of our linebackers will get a pick on Sunday. All 3 have the ability, provided we can get occasional pressure from the DL.

2) On Tuesday or Wednesday, we will sign a vet CB, and move Campbell (the safety, not the OT) to the practice squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically some person(s) think last year's Mike Williams is guaranteed to show up this year aside from him supposedly having a good camp and coming back in great condition compared to last year...

Assuming they get a run game going (yes I think we should be able to stop it, yet to be seen this year), means the defense will be facing a lot of playaction since the wideouts will face single coverage. I'd like to think Gamble could handle his own against VJax but that could be a pipe dream vs his size/speed. Rolling coverage to him leaves Munnerlyn 1on1 with Williams and no one should feel good about that scenario. Consistently moving the chains leads to points.

What I depend on Rivera/McDemott to do is find a way to keep that run game from happening, if anything. Then they can get cute with various schemes in pass coverage...

Obviously Shiano's goal of run 1st has to be effective. I like our chances but the thought running around that Munny can handle Williams 1on1 is not going to happen.

A lot of situational talk there, but that's why they play the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically some person(s) think last year's Mike Williams is guaranteed to show up this year aside from him supposedly having a good camp and coming back in great condition compared to last year...

Assuming they get a run game going (yes I think we should be able to stop it, yet to be seen this year), means the defense will be facing a lot of playaction since the wideouts will face single coverage. I'd like to think Gamble could handle his own against VJax but that could be a pipe dream vs his size/speed. Rolling coverage to him leaves Munnerlyn 1on1 with Williams and no one should feel good about that scenario. Consistently moving the chains leads to points.

What I depend on Rivera/McDemott to do is find a way to keep that run game from happening, if anything. Then they can get cute with various schemes in pass coverage...

Obviously Shiano's goal of run 1st has to be effective. I like our chances but the thought running around that Munny can handle Williams 1on1 is not going to happen.

A lot of situational talk there, but that's why they play the game.

Wouldn't be surprised if TB opened the game up with a play action deep pass to VJax. All this talk of pounding the ball and a 6'5 man child at Wideout...I hope captain brings a jet pack to get up there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...