Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Before you guys start talking about the Packers being 1-2...


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

...because I know somebody's going to make that point on here like 100 times to make the Panthers look better than they've shown, consider that as fans, naturally we'd feel better about our team being 1-2 if they had won the Superbowl two years prior than if they had been the worst team in the NFL two years prior.

This isn't to say I think the Panthers are going to keep sucking for the entire year, but using this to draw on a bigger point, before we start making parallels between them and championship contenders, can we at least wait until they actually show us they're championship contenders?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I know we were abysmal in the giants game, no way around that. It was pathetic.

I just meant we have as much of a shot as any of those other guys as long as we don't have any repat performances like thursday.

The sky isn't always falling is what I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bruce Arians said when evaluating a college prospect they have to win on 3rd down and in the 2 min drill to be successful in the nfl.
    • We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting.  I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure.  I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.
    • As much as I'd love Cam or Mahomes I'd also settle for a QB that is at least better than average at something other than 4th quarter comebacks/game winning drives. He's literally bottom third in the league in most categories (yards, completion percentage, int percentage/turnovers, YPA, IAYPA, QBR and QB rating) and right around average in a couple others, notably TD % where he is 15th and YAC/PA where he is 9th. If Bryce can improve I'll be happy with him. But all this stuff about us asking for perfection / insane ability is a bit ridiculous. Most of us "haters" just see a QB that is basically below average over his career to date and has shown relatively little consistency in his third year.  NFL offenses don't need 400 yards every week at all, but they do require a QB that can move the ball, and Bryce struggles often with that (hence why our overall offensive rank is so bad despite an overall good rushing rank).
×
×
  • Create New...