Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Going into atlanta here is where we stand in statistical comparison to the rest of the league.


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

We've had three weeks of NFL games to observe all teams on an equal field statistically. Once you hit bye weeks it gets a little more difficult until three-quarters of the way through the season because some teams' lack of an entire game's worth of raw numbers skews the stat sheet in one direction or another.

Here's where we stand in the NFL's statistical rankings, unadulterated by errors and biases in data collection.

Total Offense

By yards per game we are a respectable 13th in the league, with 363.7

By points per game we are a dismal 29th in the league, with 17.3

This is likely due to the fact that we are 30th in the league in turnover differential with -6

We are still explosive, with 6.6 yards per play, good for 2nd in the entire league.

Passing Offense

Our offense is 14th in passing yards, with Cam having passed for 798.

Cam's two touchdowns put us at 31st in the league. Only Tannehill is ranked lower. (Add in his rushing touchdowns and he vaults to a twelve-way tie for 14th place.)

Receiving Offense

Our wideouts have accumulated 844 yards receiving, good for 11th in the league.

Steve Smith is tied for 3rd with Danny Amendola for receiving yards with 296.

Rushing Offense

Our 289 total yards rushing has us mired at 19th in the league.

Deangelo Williams is 30th in yards gained with 118. He's the highest Panther on that list.

Cam has 24 rushing attempts so far this year, average of 8 carries per game. Last year his combined average over 16 games was 7.8

Total Defense

Yards per game allowed: 383, good for 8th most in the league

Points per game allowed: 26.3, leaving us tied with the Bills for 9th most allowed points

Pass Defense

Yards per game allowed: 243, leaving us at 15th in the league

Rush Defense

Yards per game allowed: 139, making us 6th in the league.

Special Teams

a687dad77da34a71933f541d1734cc2d--nfl_large_580_Unlimited.jpg

dd4cc6f6f997419c8b31156d8a6b5abc--nfl_large_580_Unlimited.jpg

Joe+Adams+Leonard+Johnson+Carolina+Panthers+9GBXvyz_d7Xl.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion: we have a lot of work left to do on all three aspects of this football team. The good news is we're actually improved on defense statistically (we were bottom five in every relevant category last year) and as Keuchly and Norman get settled in we will only improve. Cam Newton has been a victim of idiotic playcalling, but I expect that to get straightened out too.

Atlanta is going to be a big game. Let's hope we play like a better team than the stats indicate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we'll get better, esp. on offense.

i'm not worried.

despite our ineptitude in those first three games defensively we're still better statistically than we were overall last season. i expect we'll improve there. offensively we'll turn around pretty quick, i agree. i think these stats are more encouraging than they are worrying, just based on the dynamics we've seen so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to be so damn negative, but sometimes you have to admit your weaknesses to make progress.

What is it the defensive coaching staff emphasized the most in camp this year? Generating turnovers.

So, how do we reconcile our performance YTD with that emphasis? Small sample size? Ball not bouncing our way? I honestly don't know, but so far it sounds like perhaps we should have focused more on tackling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've had three weeks of NFL games to observe all teams on an equal field statistically. Once you hit bye weeks it gets a little more difficult until three-quarters of the way through the season because some teams' lack of an entire game's worth of raw numbers skews the stat sheet in one direction or another.

Here's where we stand in the NFL's statistical rankings, unadulterated by errors and biases in data collection.

Total Offense

By yards per game we are a respectable 13th in the league, with 363.7

By points per game we are a dismal 29th in the league, with 17.3

This is likely due to the fact that we are 30th in the league in turnover differential with -6

We are still explosive, with 6.6 yards per play, good for 2nd in the entire league.

Passing Offense

Our offense is 14th in passing yards, with Cam having passed for 798.

Cam's two touchdowns put us at 31st in the league. Only Tannehill is ranked lower. (Add in his rushing touchdowns and he vaults to a twelve-way tie for 14th place.)

Receiving Offense

Our wideouts have accumulated 844 yards receiving, good for 11th in the league.

Steve Smith is tied for 3rd with Danny Amendola for receiving yards with 296.

Rushing Offense

Our 289 total yards rushing has us mired at 19th in the league.

Deangelo Williams is 30th in yards gained with 118. He's the highest Panther on that list.

Cam has 24 rushing attempts so far this year, average of 8 carries per game. Last year his combined average over 16 games was 7.8

Total Defense

Yards per game allowed: 383, good for 8th most in the league

Points per game allowed: 26.3, leaving us tied with the Bills for 9th most allowed points

Pass Defense

Yards per game allowed: 243, leaving us at 15th in the league

Rush Defense

Yards per game allowed: 139, making us 6th in the league.

Special Teams

a687dad77da34a71933f541d1734cc2d--nfl_large_580_Unlimited.jpg

dd4cc6f6f997419c8b31156d8a6b5abc--nfl_large_580_Unlimited.jpg

Joe+Adams+Leonard+Johnson+Carolina+Panthers+9GBXvyz_d7Xl.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion: we have a lot of work left to do on all three aspects of this football team. The good news is we're actually improved on defense statistically (we were bottom five in every relevant category last year) and as Keuchly and Norman get settled in we will only improve. Cam Newton has been a victim of idiotic playcalling, but I expect that to get straightened out too.

Atlanta is going to be a big game. Let's hope we play like a better team than the stats indicate.

Amongst all of the crap being posted on this board, this, sir, is an AMAZING post. Good read- great insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's going to look mighty ridiculous on our part for paying all those running backs if we run for like 37 yards on 22 carries against the Falcons' terrible run D. And before anyone starts, don't underestimate this team's ability to be abysmal in a matchup they should have no problem producing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...