Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we just put this to bed now?


teeray

Recommended Posts

Ed Werder@Edwerderespn

According to Elias, Matt Ryan game-winning drive vs. Panthers first in 20 years starting inside own 5, less than minute left. No timeouts

Some of you guys have said, "You play to win the game but we played not to lose!!"

Well do you consider taking the option that hasn't happened in 20 years (punting) or the one that happens usually once a game (gaining 1 yard) as playing to win the game??

I do think however, that if the refs didn't move the ball back a full yard after the review that we would have gone for it.

And lastly, I am firmly convinced after Sunday that God hates the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care about useless statistics from twenty years ago that have no bearing on the outcome of the game in question.

Our offense is our best defense and going for it on 4th down was the only way to defend them as evidenced by the outcome.

Sorry Op, most of us knew it was game over as soon as the decision to punt was made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Op, most of us knew it was game over as soon as the decision to punt was made.

To be fair, must of us are also idiots.

Why do i get the feeling that if we had gone for it not made it some of the exact same posters would be complaining that we didn't punt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The be fair, must of the people defending this decision would be defending him had we lost going for it on 4th down. Simply changing their midset to align with RR whatever it happens to be.

Truth be told that is probably because you can make a legitimate argument either way. I was indifferent at the time of the decision.

But when they moved the ball back a full yard after the review I was leaning toward wanting to punt.

If the ball stays where they originally marked it I would have said go for it.

Some of you people act like getting 1 yard in the NFL is a given. Especially when the entire defense is keyed in on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/39772/analytics-rivera-made-wrong-choice

Yas says...

ATLANTA -- ESPN Stats & Information ran the analytics on Carolina coach Ron Rivera’s decision to punt on a fourth-and-1 late in Sunday’s game with the Falcons.

Using their win probability tool, the ESPN Stats & Information people say Rivera made the wrong choice and should have gone for the first down.

The win probability tool uses 10 years of NFL play-by-play data to estimate how likely it is that either team will win at any point in the game, based on historical results in similar game situations.

Prior to taking a delay-of-game penalty, the Panthers had a 90.9 percent chance to win.

More info in the article.

but, he pretty much states that the it was the wrong decision... then, at the end says "But I think punting was the right call".

this proves that no one will be happy. Even with stats to back it up.

I will forever feel that was the wrong call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright first of all, if you are really going to do a cost/ benefit analysis of the decision then you cant assume that you are going to down the ball on the 1- that was literally the best possible outcome of a punt. You have to consider where the average starting position would be after a punt (probably around the 10 or so).

The whole "1st time its happened in 20 years" says more about the historical incompetence of the secondary than it does about the punt/ dont punt decision

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...

http://espn.go.com/b...de-wrong-choice

Yas says...

More info in the article.

but, he pretty much states that the it was the wrong decision... then, at the end says "But I think punting was the right call".

this proves that no one will be happy. Even with stats to back it up.

I will forever feel that was the wrong call.

There is a reason statisticians write for ESPN and don't coach football. Statisticians will tell you that it is NEVER appropriate to punt on 4th and 3 or less because of expected points added.

As to that analysis in particular. If they say the win probability dipped to 54% by punting to the 1 yard line with less than a minute to play and the Falcons having no timeouts they need to reassess their algorithm.

Alright first of all, if you are really going to do a cost/ benefit analysis of the decision then you cant assume that you are going to down the ball on the 1- that was literally the best possible outcome of a punt. You have to consider where the average starting position would be after a punt (probably around the 10 or so).

The whole "1st time its happened in 20 years" says more about the historical incompetence of the secondary than it does about the punt/ dont punt decision

Still driving for a winning drive from the 10 yard line with less than a minute to go and no timeouts is much more difficult than gaining one yard in the NFL. Goal line stands happen every week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
    • Nothing about the Flyers scare me. They are a mid team that just barely made the playoffs. 
×
×
  • Create New...