Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Al Wallace talks to Frank Garcia on the Bustin Loose show


jarhead

Recommended Posts

Al Wallace/Frank Garcia brought up some interesting points:

  • Cam needs to keep his mouth shut,quit pouting and quit trying to be "cool"
  • Chud needs to commit to the run and quit all the chute stuff
  • Al played under Rivera in Philly and said his coaching style is not being emotional but in his experience Rivera was a good coach that knows his stuff as a Defensive coach but is unsure how he would be as a head coach
  • Frank spoke with Hurney after he was fired and Hurney stated one of the major problems is there is not a leader on offense
  • Frank and Moose agreed Chud need to find an offensive identity and stick to it.Best was is to commit to the power running attack and wear the opponents defense down More crossing patterns that Cam can make and have him getting more snaps under center.Frank said he lost confidence when the question was ask of Rivera what was wrong and he did not know

In summary we have a train wreck with multiple problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting tidbit I heard on the morning show was that in the 10 plays that they ran the read option against the Cowboys, they averages 4.6 ypc (it was 4.something) but in the normal power run formation they ran 5 times for a 1.8 ypc. Not sure if it was that way in other games but it is interesting.

Of course this all goes back to what they are saying about having an identity. Commit to the normal run formation and I am sure that would not be the trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting tidbit I heard on the morning show was that in the 10 plays that they ran the read option against the Cowboys, they averages 4.6 ypc (it was 4.something) but in the normal power run formation they ran 5 times for a 1.8 ypc. Not sure if it was that way in other games but it is interesting.

Of course this all goes back to what they are saying about having an identity. Commit to the normal run formation and I am sure that would not be the trend.

That's because of Cam's long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting tidbit I heard on the morning show was that in the 10 plays that they ran the read option against the Cowboys, they averages 4.6 ypc (it was 4.something) but in the normal power run formation they ran 5 times for a 1.8 ypc. Not sure if it was that way in other games but it is interesting.

Of course this all goes back to what they are saying about having an identity. Commit to the normal run formation and I am sure that would not be the trend.

Thanks, I've been interested to see just how many times they use the option. While I would rather see it ever, it has been thrown around here that it is the base offense. 10 out of 68 plays does not make it the base offense any more than 10 3-4 looks makes you a bas 3-4.

Regardless, it's garbage outside of a sneaky look at it here and there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Al Wallace can eat a d*ck. He was part of the loser culture while he was here. He was so happy to be on an NFL roster that he welcomed up and down seasons and loved the fact that he was never part of a consistent winner. Cam has never lost and he hates it. I hope he never gets used to it here.

Yes, the loser culture that played in the Superbowl, an NFC Championship game. The loser culture that won 4 road playoff games and 2 home playoff games.

Seriously, if you don't know what you are talking about, please just keep to yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Al Wallace can eat a d*ck. He was part of the loser culture while he was here. He was so happy to be on an NFL roster that he welcomed up and down seasons and loved the fact that he was never part of a consistent winner. Cam has never lost and he hates it. I hope he never gets used to it here.

you're a idiot.

Sorry guys but someone needs to tell him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that the same culture that produced zero back to back winning seasons? This is the same culture that loved getting people off the scrap heap and then when it stopped working you all hated Hurney for ignoring the free agent market. Yeah that is the same theory of operating this organization that has us at 1-5. You fools can eat one too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Al Wallace can eat a d*ck. He was part of the loser culture while he was here. He was so happy to be on an NFL roster that he welcomed up and down seasons and loved the fact that he was never part of a consistent winner. Cam has never lost and he hates it. I hope he never gets used to it here.

I personally respect him and agree with him.He was not bashing Cam just calling him out as well as others for his statements and attitude.He said that defenses will key in on it and use it against us.

He also complimented LaFell on his comment that "we just need to do our jobs" and leave it at that.Its all on how the media is managing him not him managing the media .

As far as his culture and him as a player I thought he did what we brought him in to do and did well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that the same culture that produced zero back to back winning seasons? This is the same culture that loved getting people off the scrap heap and then when it stopped working you all hated Hurney for ignoring the free agent market. Yeah that is the same theory of operating this organization that has us at 1-5. You fools can eat one too.

Are you still in middle school?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...