The non-call on 4th down

[Mr. Scot]

Should it have been a penalty?

Why or why not?

[Chimera]

Ball was uncatchable.

[Lilsmitty09]

no. crabapple was pushing off. and was too hard of a catch

[Oldschool Leroy]

no, It should not have been a penalty because I prefered the Ravens win.

[Jim Harbaugh]

Ball was uncatchable.

/end thread

[cultclassiccat]

both sides were mauling each other all night, the noncall was consistant.

[Mr. Scot]

no, It should not have been a penalty because I prefered the Ravens win.

Bias affecting how we view a call?

Unheard of :lol:

[TANTRIC-NINJA]

Two hands immediately on a wr past 5yards is a auto holding call.. It was blatant on the cb who was hoping on the refs to swallow the whistle. Phil Simms trying to say Crabtree was pushing off as he was trying to get away from his hold.

How about the helmet to helmet hit on the play before that was never acknowledged?

If this was a Panthers game my head woulda imploded!

[Rags]

ehy were both going at it that play. Too much contact for it to be a flag on one player.

[osd22]

Ball was uncatchable.

I am not sure if that does only apply on PI, but on a holding?! I think it was a missed call.

[KendrickPanther]

If I was a ref I would have called it. That's the only way I can really look at it and give you an answer. Still I think the 49er fans crying that they got robbed are babies.

[Navy_football]

It was a missed call. He didn't give Crabtree a chance to make a play on the ball. If he is free and jumps, the ball may have been catchable.

[bab270]

Ball was uncatchable.

It was only a foot past his outstretched arms. He could have easily caught it without the hold. The ball barely landed out of bounds, so he definitely could have got his feet in bounds.

Also, catchability doesn't matter all that much on a holding call.

[KendrickPanther]

Ball was uncatchable.

Imagine if somebody had held Dwight Clark.....