Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Gore is a Sore Loser


chknwing

Recommended Posts

"They got away with one," running back Frank Gore said, via The Associated Press. "We showed we were the better team. It was just a couple plays here, a couple plays there."

You showed you were the better team? When? For like 4 minutes after the power came back on? This is just an assinine thing for him to say. Baltimore shut the niners down the entire first half and held on to win with a goal line stand. Not sure what game Gore was watching, but the niners got beat thouroughly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard for me to judge these guys on a comment made after a game. They were just in a 4 hour contest where you have to leave your human emotions and pain tolerance at the door. That's the same reason I think the Cam criticism is BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with him.. When the fumble happend the score could have either been 10-7 or 6-7, and instead ended up being 14-3. The interception didnt help and the kick return just made it ridiculous.

There's a whole lot of football in those excuses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ravens may have dominated for 3 quarters or whatever(bit generous to give them a full 3quarters) but they were one lucky blown pass interference/holding call in the end zone from losing that game. the ravens didn't play a full game and almost lost it. they were close to losing it the same way the falcons did a game earlier and we did over and over. they got too comfortable with a lead, took the foot off the gas on offense and hoped their defense would protect the score.

people make it sound like the 49ers got blown away, but that just wasn't the case and Gore's got a right to be pissed...they just barely missed bringing home a lombardi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ravens may have dominated for 3 quarters or whatever(bit generous to give them a full 3quarters) but they were one lucky blown pass interference/holding call in the end zone from losing that game. the ravens didn't play a full game and almost lost it. they were close to losing it the same way the falcons did a game earlier and we did over and over. they got too comfortable with a lead, took the foot off the gas on offense and hoped their defense would protect the score.

people make it sound like the 49ers got blown away, but that just wasn't the case and Gore's got a right to be pissed...they just barely missed bringing home a lombardi.

understood, but he said they showed they were the best team, they clearly did not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you only played well for 4 minutes and was going to take the lead for the win..you are clearly the better team. Just did not win.

Ravens earned and deserved the game.

Or should Gore say, we were lucky to have a chance...Flacco is way to good and we were thankful for playing in the game.. Uh no

cut him immediately!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...