Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NY philosophy


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

I have mentioned this a few times already on other posts in the past hat Gettleman may take a NY approach to business. Since his 15 years with the NYG, they have only taken "three" offensive lineman in the early rounds. Both Snee and Beatty were 2nd rounders and only Petitgout was a 1st rounder. Other than that, it's been guys off FA for them.

Got a feeling we're going to sign a couple of veteran O-lineman soon. Maybe, by the end of this weekend we'll add a guy or two. There have been news that guys like Williams and Omayile are visiting, and we're in talk with Kevin Boothe. If Gettleman stays true to his NY philosophy, we'll be adding 1-2 of those guys soon.

Don't look for any sexy signings in FA or taking an OL in the first two rounds. I should have been smarter to not think that we were going to sign Antoine Cason. OL will probably be the only position we'll add in FA. Maybe a DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff Hatch was a 3rd-rounder in 2002, but interesting point nevertheless. OL picks are conspicuously lacking.

By contrast they've drafted 8 defensive lineman with their first and second rounders alone in the same time period. This is partly what has me convinced we'll sign a vet OG (as Chuck said) and that we'll pay Hardy what he deserves when the time comes. Heavily investing in the defensive line wins you superbowl rings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's in our signatures, Chuck. He said it from the get go. Big men allow you to compete.

My point is, Gman is taking the approach he was taught how to build a championship team. Some people like me are here waiting for Gman to sign a CB, FS, DT, etc while we're forgetting his philosophy. That is, adding veteran OLs through FA.

I'm more relieved now knowing we're taking the same approach as the Gmen. I'm relieved not kicking my @ss every day bc we're not adding a sexy position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants have had a pretty solid o-line for a while. Ours is one of our top 2 weaknesses. He'll fix that.

We're not terrible. It has always been a struggle for our OLINE to play well early in the season. I can't ever remember a season where our OLINE didn't played poorly to start the season.

But, like i said i can wake up in the morning knowing our main goal in FA is to add veteran O-linemen. That's how NY Blue have done it since when, and it has worked for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not terrible. It has always been a struggle for our OLINE to play well early in the season. I can't ever remember a season where our OLINE didn't played poorly to start the season.

But, like i said i can wake up in the morning knowing our main goal in FA is to add veteran O-linemen. That's how NY Blue have done it since when, and it has worked for them.

To me, this is a good point. I think we will see big improvement at LG, and LT and C are going to be good.

What I want to see is the right side of the line moving people in the run game. With Silatolu's ability to block in space (Pulling), we could really open the run game up with a bull dozer at RG and a good run-blocking RT. We are missing that right now.

I am not sure all of the candidates are here to interview for the RG position. I think RG and RT are going to be upgraded. Bell is good depth, but we need a stud RT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, this is a good point. I think we will see big improvement at LG, and LT and C are going to be good.

What I want to see is the right side of the line moving people in the run game. With Silatolu's ability to block in space (Pulling), we could really open the run game up with a bull dozer at RG and a good run-blocking RT. We are missing that right now.

I am not sure all of the candidates are here to interview for the RG position. I think RG and RT are going to be upgraded. Bell is good depth, but we need a stud RT.

Yea, to follow on to my previous post, if we were to sign Boothe I wouldn't feel concerned about having a rookie RT if they decided to upgrade from Bell. If Fluker somehow fell to the 2nd or there's another mauler RT available in the 2nd he'd have to be strongly considered if we have a strong vet at RG. I just wouldn't want to have a RT learning the ropes with a scrub like Hangman or some other comparable FA or a rookie beside him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see this: Sign a RT to compete, go ahead and pay a little bit for a RG---Boothe would be worth a $12 million contract over 4 years, IMO. That would pretty much use up the rest of our cap space, so more moves need to be made.

Cut GWilliams, Hangartner and free up another $3 million. Sign a DT.

We have to enter the draft thinking, "We are getting 2 starters out of the draft." Draft DT (I think we need 2) and a CB or WR. In rounds 4-6, however, add depth at the OL. Get a raw, developmental LT project to groom for next season--since Gross did not cut his pay, this is his last season (someone like Quessenberry or Faulk). Get a G. Add a RB.

Every year, in the late rounds, draft a lineman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am no football savant as has been demonstrated here over and over, but I saw it.  I went for years doing the mock draft thing and researching the players that we might get around our pick, time consuming stuff. And we would get to the draft and trade the pick. All that time, wasted.  So I quit doing that. Also realized I was not a scout and would never be a scout and went to looking the videos and reports After  we picked a guy.  Maybe I would look at the 1st round, but quit that too and just looked after we picked.    When they did that trade I saw Bryce and his size and just ruled him out. Then it got to yeah they are probably going to take him, I relented and looked at some video and got to his pro day. It took me all of a few minutes to see the issues. The footwork. The arm. And the tape of games? The backyard style. I knew, what can I say?  (Also, went down the physical checklist, not a single plus attribute on the NFL level. Arm, speed, size, etc, nothing to offset the negatives. nothing)  I think it was easy for me because I had not watched a single game he played in college,and wasn’t drawn in by the hype. Had no preconceived notions and just looked at it pretty clinically.  I got in here and everyone was going “but look at what he did in college! It is the SEC, if he can do it in the SEC he can do it in the NFL!” Couldn’t reason with hardly anyone.  I don’t think I could tell you which guy would succeed between two prototypical guys with great arms and athleticism, and have no special insight into any of that. My one calling in football scouting was to see the real about what we were about to do. And you still don’t know for sure until they get in a real game in the NFL. 
    • Miss Bryce sorely is possibly the most hilarious statement I have read on the Huddle in quite some time.
    • He did only throw 1 pass 20+ in that game. I think he is still struggling to adjust to the NFL. At Alabama he was able to extend plays and play backyard football. That's not only not the style of offense we have been running but his physical skills don't lend themselves to that style of play at this level.  So, the amount of issues he actually has to clean up are WAAAAAY more than I anticipated as a guy that had Bryce #1 on my board in that draft class.  I am just not seeing a reasonable path for him to clean it all up and develop in a reasonable timeframe 
×
×
  • Create New...