Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How long does a house stay in foreclosure?


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

So, they left their animals there to die once the food and water ran out? I don't care how far south and how quickly things turned for the worse, that's simply not what a normal human being does....sorry.

 

Have a friend in the real estate FC business in High Point/GSO and he told me I'd be surprised just how many people leave their animals behind.

 

I'm pretty non-judgmental about most things, but that is certainly not excusable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sounds like it is in need of a fire!

 

 

if there was a house like that in my hood....it would be tempting

 

Was going to say the same thing.

 

 

 

 

A few years back there were some townhomes on the east side of Gboro that were only half built when the developer went under/abandoned the project as the housing market collapsed.  The townhomes backed up on a neighborhood and those home owners claimed that between the vermin and the half built structures forming a backdrop to their homes and the weak market their home values were getting the double whammy.  The county refused to do anything to remedy the situation.

 

 

They mysteriously burned down...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The appraiser guy said basically as long as the structure and foundation are sound you keep it

 

 

He's right.

 

You can rip out all the flooring and drywall and have them replaced for 10K or so.

 

After ripping out the drywall and any insulation that the water touched you will have a good idea if the structure itself is in good shape.  Depending on the price, someone smart will go in there and have it fixed up within 4 months if they have a little cash sitting around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

So it finally went on sale for 70k above the Zillow estimate. Somebody is going to get hosed if they offer anything near that. The yard is screwed up. They threw up cheap plywood stuff like a front railing that will have to be replaced.

 

The fact that the cleaners came in and cleaned everything up in a day makes me think there will be lingering issues. 

 

Caveat Emptor

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it finally went on sale for 70k above the Zillow estimate. Somebody is going to get hosed if they offer anything near that. The yard is screwed up. They threw up cheap plywood stuff like a front railing that will have to be replaced.

 

The fact that the cleaners came in and cleaned everything up in a day makes me think there will be lingering issues. 

 

Caveat Emptor

 

 

Just an FYI, Zillow is absolutely terrible about determining actual values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an FYI, Zillow is absolutely terrible about determining actual values.

 

I know but it's not bad in my neighborhood. Our house was appraised at 10k below Zillow this year.

 

Our house is 800 sf bigger than next door and the listing is 95k more than we bought ours for a few years ago..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bank finally did something and it is going for sale or auction, not sure which.

 

So a cleaning crew comes in and they said it was the second worst house they had ever seen. The trash bill alone will be at least 10k.

 

There are dead animals. Dogfood all around. BBs in every room. They tried to move a fussball table down the stairs and it got stuck so they left it. Lot's of mud and dirt.

 

Mold anyone?

 

And they left all their poo. Like entire rooms full of stuff.  Lots of personal pictures

 

they said the one kid had makeshift weapons made out of wood and nails and his room was vampire themed.

 

This is the same kid who shot a neighborhood dog with a bow and arrow. And drove his dirt-bike in a circle on their front yard (this is an upscale neighborhood.) And would start grass fires in the common area.

 

They took the guts out of all HVAC units.

 

But the kicker...they cut the pipes. So when the water was turned back on everything flooded. I guess it was either copper and worth something or they were just sabotaging to be dicks.

 

At least they aren't our neighbors anymore.

 

When my wife and I were first married, we owned a small house in a relatively isolated area on a very small parcel of land.  We decided to move to a bigger house, and rented out the smaller one.  Our first renters were pretty decent.  The guy would get drunk and complain a lot about things that were out of my control (like to many birds flying over :)), but he paid the rent and took good care of the place. 

 

But our next renter was horrible.  She paid the rent in cash on time for about the first 8 months or so.  Then she just disappeared.  I went to the house every couple of days for a couple of weeks, and no one was home.  The place appeared to have been abandoned.  So eventually, I just went in. 

 

I was shocked at what had been done to the place.  Someone had taken brass knuckles and punched holes in the wall.  I had to go back out to my truck and get my heavy boots out because their were syringes laying on the floor.  The washing machine had mushrooms growing in it because someone had left a piece of meat laying in it.  They had ripped the floorboard up seemingly just for the heck of it.  They had urinated on the walls and floors.  By the time I finished going through the place, I was nearly in tears at the condition of it. 

 

I cleaned it as best I could, and sold it for what I could get for it.  In the end, I lost about 10 grand on it.  I swore then I would never be a landlord ever again. 

 

I found out later own that the renter was convicted of sexual abuse of her 12 year old son, and her boyfriend that had been staying with her was convicted of running a meth ring.  She truly was scum of the earth.  But I guess I should be glad they didn't turn my place into a meth lab.  At least I was able to get a little money out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...