Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: 49ers looking to trade up to 13 or 14...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

So the 9ers will pass up a chance at 3 starters to get 1 starter, who by everyones thinking will be just as talented as the players we could get at the bottom of the first?

Makes sense.

because the Niners have as many needs as we do. And they have so many picks its unreal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you are a player or two away from another super bowl it does.

Ok, but if you can get a player of the same quality (and more of them) at the bottom of the first,with smaller price tags, what is the point in moving up?

I'm saying this because its being said that there's no difference in the quality player at 14 than there is st 31. And obviously there would have to be or there would be no reason to move up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me 31, 61, and 74 (our original 3rd rd pick) or 31 and 34, which is essentially two late 1st rounders and let's go to work!

Option A gives us: 31, 44, 61, 74 in the first 3 rounds

Option B gives us: 31, 34, 44 in the 1st 2 rounds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With how many needs we have id do that trade.

Easily could get 3 starters.

SF has a better team than we have so it will be harder for them to find 3 starters etc, so they are looking for that 1 player to come in and start.

I would really try to squeeze them for that 3rd as well.

The thought of this makes me cream

1st Cyprien

2nd Warford

2nd Short

3rd Rodgers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True.Btw, who's the guy who's reporting this? Josh Norris? is he a legit guy?

josh is legit, but he's quoting evan silva, who is also legit. both guys work for rotoworld. josh norris is somewhat new to the scene, but silva has been around for a while. both guys know their poo, but silva knows more people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time we've traded with the 49ers, we end up getting the ass end of the stick. I'm staying put!

"Every time"? You mean the one time we traded and used the acquired pick stupidly to take Brown? The trade was proper value, we didn't get hustled or anything. We just spent the pick poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...