Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Day 3: Draft Discussion


saX man

Recommended Posts

Bullshit and you know it

OK, I admit he may not be BPA on your very well researched, expert draft board.

But, as has been pointed out, he's a pretty damned good player. And he could well have been the BPA on Getteman's board.

I sense a touch of discontent about you that Getteman didn't check with you first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I cant complain much. It seems they are making the team much deeper than it has been in the past few years and I would take quality depth over drafting a supposed starter that isnt any better than a fa they can get for cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defend the LB pick? Easy.

Two of our starters have a significant injury history and he can back up all three positions better than any of our current back ups.

Great leader, great locker room guy and probably also a special teamer.

How can you ask for more in the fifth?

Too bad this guy could barely play ILB in college. If they were going to draft depth, they should have taken a OLB that could at least sub in to pass rush. Instead, they took a guy that plays slower then his 40 time, and is repeatedly knocked for not being able to tackle is space. Just what I want on special teams, a guy that can't tackle a Big 12 RB, let alone a NFL returner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad this guy could barely play ILB in college. If they were going to draft depth, they should have taken a OLB that could at least sub in to pass rush. Instead, they took a guy that plays slower then his 40 time, and is repeatedly knocked for not being able to tackle is space. Just what I want on special teams, a guy that can't tackle a Big 12 RB, let alone a NFL returner.

how does a LB that cant tackle win defensive player of the yr?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, no I’m not going to panic when he got 2 Qs and looked great in 1 and looked not great in another (let’s not mention the drop).    Yeah we finally have a team that would be considered average offensively around him. Let’s roll this season. 
    • The woe is me everything but Bryce sucks mantra is stale af my friend. Look nobody here is going to argue with the fact Frank Reich was not a good head coach. At the same time. Bryce Young is now in his second season with his second coaching staff and a handpicked young offensive head coach who has been known for working with QB's such as Baker and Geno. As far as the offensive pieces around Bryce we have the 4th highest salary cap allocation (that might be even higher now after the new Moton deal) dedicated to the OL in the entire league. We have 2 first round WR's one of them 8th overall the first time we've ever selected a WR that high in franchise history. And the fact of the matter is Bryce Young did not have a good preseason. It's not the first time it's happened either. We all hope to see he and the rest of the team flip a switch in week 1. But we should all be able to agree that the offensive performances we've seen from the entire QB room (Bryce included) in preseason was simply unacceptable.
    • We have seen Bryce play… what… 9 games with AT BEST what one would consider NFL average WRs? You just can’t see the forest for the trees and keep going back to your lazy take of revisionist history.    he looked AWFUL Y1 with the worst coaching I’ve ever seen in the NFL and one of the weakest WR rooms I can recall. He looked awful first half of y2 and great second half of y2 with average coaching and average skill position. I don’t know where this elite talent argument even comes from. 
×
×
  • Create New...