Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Trade A 1st Rounder For Victor Cruz?


Paige

Recommended Posts

with him having problems getting a deal done in nyg got me thinking maybe Gettlemen who should know him really well could somehow make a deal with them and bring him here?

 

I would do it in a heartbeat not only will that give our #2 for this season but Cruz could take over as #1 once Smitty is done.

 

Our WR AFTER Deal

#1WR:Smitty

#2wr Cruz

#3:Lafell/Hixon

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are that desperate yet. I would not give up a 1st at this point. If Smitty were to suddenly retire I would, though. At this point I think we will have options next year. Like someone else said, maybe we use our first 2 picks next year on WRs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know. A ton of teams are gonna jump on Nicks too.

 

True but he is from Charlotte and has mentioned that he would love to play here. Make him a reasonable offer is all I am asking for and let him decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would, because it would become a late 1st. The trickery is affording him/ willing to pay more than the Giants would to keep him. As they can match any offer we make.

 

But yes I would do it.

 

See but we have to send a pick AND sign Cruz to a deal....not cool

 

I could maybe be ok with one or the other.

 

That is why drafting a WR or signing a FA WR like Nicks is the best course of action

 

 

BTW that 1st Marty wanted to trade away to teams in the 2nd was for Clausen ....that  netted us Cam Newton the next year. Let's not gamble like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...