Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you become romantically involved with someone that has an infant?


Floppin

Recommended Posts

daughters tend to look like their mothers when they grow up, so you can put "will always look good" in the plus column.  her mom is a good looking woman for her age.

 

BTW, just saying this I would personally take the photo down, posting your bosses family photo to a bunch of random people on the internet is a bad idea, especially without permission.

 

I already had before you even posted this message heh. 

 

As I said in my message, I was only going to keep it up briefly.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap... I missed the photo, lol.

 

 

 

How did the hanging out with her feel? Comfortable, strange, wishing her folks weren't there so you could get intimate?

 

 

A little of all three?

 

Yeah a little of all three. The BBQ was after her son's christening/baptism, so the absentee father had drove down from Maryland and was there as well. All in all it was a little awkward. I just drank hennessy with the mom and played cards for the majority of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She would have to be incredibly, almost out of this world hot.

So 99% of the time the answer is no.

Baggage. Baby daddy drama. Not to mention there is probably an Arbys Big Montana downstairs.

the girl floppin is talking about is a decent 9.5/10 so very hot.

I have rules for girls I'd date, and some of them are:

1, Must be out on her own for two years, I don't want to date someone who has an unrealistic view of how life works, if she's never had bills to pay I don't want her telling me about all her money problems.

2, must be legal drinking age, nothing like trying to go somewhere fun or do something fun, but she can't go because she's too young.

3, (this isn't an issue now but it's been one in the past) don't date anyone where you work, makes it awkward for not just you but other coworkers if you break up(weirdest moment in my life when one of these went south).

4, no kids, I'm not interested at the moment in raising other people's kids, this is subject to change as I get older, but yeah not right now.

I guess some of these rules are why I haven't been in any serious relationships in a while, oh well... but #3 is one I've added because of a bad expirence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

missed the pic too...just my luck.  9.5 out of 10....makes me sad even more!!!

 

my initial thought was hell no, I'm not taking a chance with my bosses daughter...why lose a job and a girl at the same time...potentially.

 

my answer now though depends totally on the relationship I had with the boss!  If that's a cool and strong relationship then I'm sure dating the daughter would be a real good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me the party pooper but I didn't see the pic....and that doesn't matter. She could be a 11 out 10.

1. Baby daddy drama

2. Your bosses daughter

Stay away from this chick unless your job is something you deem temporary. If it is just a "job" and not part of what you deem your "career"....well, then the 11 aspect would carry much more weight in the discussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guaranteed there will be baby daddy drama...that's inevitable

 

the boss's daughter thing could work in your advantage though if this chick really is the one for you and have a long/great relationship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah a little of all three. The BBQ was after her son's christening/baptism, so the absentee father had drove down from Maryland and was there as well. All in all it was a little awkward. I just drank hennessy with the mom and played cards for the majority of the time.

Sounds complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds complicated.

 

Well, it's not complicated at this point, but only because we haven't done anything that really enters myself into the equation. The situation, potentially, has a rather large chance of being complicated. I'm just trying to figure out if it's worth the risk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...