Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Veteran cornerbacks that might be cut in training camp?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Given the right opportunity I think the Panthers could sign a veteran cornerback that is cut during training camp, ala Dwan Edwards last year.  Much like defensive tackle last year, the Panthers brass didn't address the position in the draft and brought in bargain free agents to fill the void. 

 

This is all speculation but here's a list of teams that have a logjam at cornerback.

 

 

The Arizona Cardinals made cornerback a priority in the offseason and could end up cutting one or more cornerbacks.  With Patrick Peterson a rising star, behind him is Javier Arenas, Antonie Cason, Jerraud Powers, among others.  This article raises the possibility that second year corner Jamell Fleming, a third round pick in 2012, could be cut.  Would he even be worth bringing in if he was cut?  http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2013/5/3/4296146/arizona-cardinals-offseason-acquisitions-of-cornerbacks-raise

 

The 49ers have four starting caliber corners.  Carlos Rogers, Tarell Brown, Chris Culliver and Nnamdi Asomugha. The 49ers are loaded all over the roster and could use the space to carry an extra WR with Crabtree out.  http://49ers.pressdemocrat.com/2013/05/inside-the-49ers/a-statistical-comparison-of-the-49ers-top-cornerbacks/

 

Denver has a surplus at corner with Champ Bailey, Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, and Chris Harris Jr, but after them is a slew of young unproven guys.  Anyone they cut might be a player much like the Panthers already have.  http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1649079-breaking-down-the-denver-broncos-cornerback-competition

 

The Bengals have Dre Kirkpatrick, Leon Hall, Terrence Newman, and Pacman Jones at corner.  It's safe to say the Panthers would never sign Pacman, but could Newman be cut?  http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1636618-cincinnati-bengals-will-dre-kirkpatrick-start-at-cornerback-in-2013

 

Not sure any of the guys who could be on the chopping block represent an immediate upgrade, but there are surprise cuts every year.  I think the Panthers would pounce on the right opportunity.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Florence surprises, but I honestly didn't and don't understand that signing.  Obviously the coaches saw something in him that others didn't.  And it's not like he's a young guy who can improve and become part of our core.  In terms of veteran stop gaps, I definitely thought we could've done better.

 

But, again, it's not always trying to find a "better" player, sometimes it's about finding the right player that fits what you're trying to do.  Hopefully we have that guy in Florence.  I'd still feel a lot better about our secondary if we brought in one more potential starting caliber vet at either CB or S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vet O-linemen is highly likely IMO.

 

I hope so.  Bell is serviceable at best and we know Hangartner sucks at RG and I don't want to depend on a raw D2 4th round rookie there either.  We definitely need to add another solid vet on the OL.

 

One more solid vet OL and one more solid vet DB and I think we're about as good as we're gonna get this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see a RG being picked up. Maybe even a RT if the right guy were to hit the market. I just don't think any DB will be brought in. I really think Gettlemen is serious about liking our DBs.

Same with WR. I know plenty of folks want a new shiney WR. I just don't think we could get that lucky for a quality starting WR would fall into our laps.

Oh, oh, or maybe a TE if one were to be cut. I could live with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Florence surprises, but I honestly didn't and don't understand that signing.  Obviously the coaches saw something in him that others didn't.  And it's not like he's a young guy who can improve and become part of our core.  In terms of veteran stop gaps, I definitely thought we could've done better.

 

But, again, it's not always trying to find a "better" player, sometimes it's about finding the right player that fits what you're trying to do.  Hopefully we have that guy in Florence.  I'd still feel a lot better about our secondary if we brought in one more potential starting caliber vet at either CB or S.

I agree but I guess they added him for depth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see a RG being picked up. Maybe even a RT if the right guy were to hit the market. I just don't think any DB will be brought in. I really think Gettlemen is serious about liking our DBs.

Same with WR. I know plenty of folks want a new shiney WR. I just don't think we could get that lucky for a quality starting WR would fall into our laps.

Oh, oh, or maybe a TE if one were to be cut. I could live with that.

 

 

If what I read about Shula going to the ground and pound we need a rg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...