Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HOW CAN THEY WRITE THIS CRAP?


Zod

Recommended Posts

Pie should be something that is eaten warm with a scoop of your choice of ice cream. Vanilla is preferred but to each his own. Any pie that is cold tells me instantly that any hack could mix water with powder cover and stick it in the fridge. If it doesn't require a preheated oven, a sweet little grandma in an apron, and at least several steps it just ain't pie. IMO of course.

Bingo. Legit post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using your definition of pie, I will add the definition of fruit. " fruit is a part of a flowering plant that derives from specific tissues of the flower, one or more ovaries, and in some cases accessory tissues."

Chocolate, therefore, does not come from a can of Nestle's Quick, it comes from a flowering, fruit-bearing botanical life form--chocolate is fruit.

How long until camp starts?

The cacoa plant produces fruit. We use the cocoa beans inside the fruit to create chocolate. I guess you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cacoa plant produces fruit. We use the cocoa beans inside the fruit to create chocolate. I guess you're right.

Thank you.  A scholar ascends above the crop of GED candidates.

 

Seriously, in related news, I just saw on TV that the ADA has declared obesity to be a disease. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...