Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Coleman worth a look in the supplemental draft?


Recommended Posts

I dont think he is eligible and by all accounts I have read he is playing next year and planning to enter the 2014 draft.  The six players that appear to be eligible are:

 

DE James Boyd, UNLV

DT Nate Holloway, UNLV

DE Toby Jackson, Central Florida

WR DeWayne Peace, Houston

WR O.J. Ross, Purdue

DB Damond Smith, South Alabama

 

If he were/is eligible then he might be worth a look. Sounds very interesting as he could be a gem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The supplemental draft uses the lottery style draft.  You bid a pick on a player and who ever bids highest wins.  What ever pick you bid you lose come next draft.  Say we bid a second rounder on a player and win, now we have no 2nd round pick in the upcoming draft.  

 

 

I say no to this.  For the first time in a long time we have our full compliment of draft picks and this seems to be a pretty good draft for WR coming up.  Lets just play this out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the usual picks you give up next year for a supplemental draft pick?

Didn't the Browns have to give up like a 3rd for Joe Haden?

None of those guys intrigue me.

Browns took a second in the supplimental on Josh Gordon. Worked well for them.

I agree though you shouldn't give up picks unless you think there is somebody that can make an immidiate impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the usual picks you give up next year for a supplemental draft pick?

 

Didn't the Browns have to give up like a 3rd for Joe Haden?

 

None of those guys intrigue me.

 

 

Haden was a top ten pick in his draft. They did give a 2nd rounder last year in the supplemental draft for Josh Gordon, who actually played pretty well for them last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The supplemental draft uses the lottery style draft.  You bid a pick on a player and who ever bids highest wins.  What ever pick you bid you lose come next draft.  Say we bid a second rounder on a player and win, now we have no 2nd round pick in the upcoming draft.  

 

 

I say no to this.  For the first time in a long time we have our full compliment of draft picks and this seems to be a pretty good draft for WR coming up.  Lets just play this out.

 

 

 

yea I would only do this if I felt like WR was the ONLY piece we absolutely needed to guarantee a superbowl run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haden was a top ten pick in his draft. They did give a 2nd rounder last year in the supplemental draft for Josh Gordon, who actually played pretty well for them last year. 

 

yep got the two switched. How do they decide what you give up for a pick though?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep got the two switched. How do they decide what you give up for a pick though?

 

 

 

someone mentioned in a post above but it's a bidding system. The highest bidder is awarded the player, but loses that pick in the following draft. So if we bid a third rounder, but the 49ers bid a second rounder and no one else places a bid- the 9ers will be awarded the player but lose their 2014 second rounder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep got the two switched. How do they decide what you give up for a pick though?

Team places a pick (any round they choose) on said player. Then the highest pick wins. If two teams place the same bid the player goes to the one with the worst record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...