Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN is reporting Wharton canceled his trip to Denver


jarhead

Recommended Posts

I'd rather sign Mikell and extend The Kraken's contract

 

This should be the plan imo. Much bigger hole at SS than backup OG.  If this is an option we would be crazy not to go with this plan of action...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be the plan imo. Much bigger hole at SS than backup OG. If this is an option we would be crazy not to go with this plan of action...

I'd say both are equally important (might even give RG/T the edge) but the problem is we don't know how healthy Wharton is. That's why I'd sign Mikell over Wharton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say both are equally important (might even give RG/T the edge) but the problem is we don't know how healthy Wharton is. That's why I'd sign Mikell over Wharton

 

I think Mikell would start at SS, wouldn't say the same for Wharton one based on injury, two based on the fact that he's not the same player.  That's why I say SS is more important.  Not necessarily that OG isn't just as important, but of the players available SS is the one where we can get a starter from.  Much rather grab a starter and lock up Hardy, then a guy who will be depth and might not even be ready to play till week six. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be the plan imo. Much bigger hole at SS than backup OG.  If this is an option we would be crazy not to go with this plan of action...

 

Hate to break it to you, but it Wharton signs he WILL BE starting this season...at either RG or RT.

 

He is an upgrade to both Bell and Hangman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce hasn't done a single thing to prove he deserves to have his option picked up.  I'd have less of an issue with us declining the option and bringing him back as the starter next year than I would have us picking up that option, as that means he's on our cap books for the next 2 years instead of 1, even if he's cut before year 5. Tua threw for 3,500 yards with a 25-8 TD-INT ratio in just 13 starts the year before they picked up his option, and then threw for over 4,600 yards before they gave him his extension. Kyler threw for 3,722, 3,971, and 3,787 in 16, 16, and 14 games (while rushing for 544, 819, and 423 in those seasons) before they picked up his option and then signed him to an extension before year 4. Jones threw for 3,200 yards with a 3-1 TD-INT ratio with another 700 yards and 7 TDs rushing in year 4 before they signed him to his extension. Bryce has thrown for 2,877 and 2,400 yards in 16 and 12 starts his two seasons, while being on pace for 3,128 yards in a 17 game season so far this year. The closest comparison to any of them was Jones, who while he's turned it around this year, is someone I think everyone can agree was not a player who deserved that extension after that season. If people think those other QB's having their options picked up and/or given extensions were a mistake, in what world can you look at what Bryce has done and make any rational argument for him even being brought back as our starter next year, let alone also picking up his option that would cost us about $27 million fully guaranteed.
    • I don't think we would actually play Hooker but hopefully we also just don't see. I don't view Dalton/Bryce as a worse option than Winston/Howell. I just think we disagree on this specific subject is all.
    • I guarantee tepper would fire him if we lost out and he’d be justified 
×
×
  • Create New...