Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike and Mike have us 8-8 & 9-7


section543

Recommended Posts

I really don't know if there is a harder team to predict then the Carolina Panthers. We went 7-9 last year and thats with:

-Literally giving the game to the Falcons

-Having a 10 point lead IN THE 4th QUARTER against the bears, and losing

-Being up 8 with 20 seconds left vs the Buccs, and losing

-Having 1st and goal vs the Seahawks to win the game and missing all 4 times

-Losing to the Chiefs after their emotional suicide (We would win 8 out of 10 times)

-(not sure if we would have won) But get completely screwed on about 3-4 straight plays against Dallas to end the game

Without even kidding we seriously should have been at least 10-6. But at the same time, the good teams completely destroyed us (Giants, Broncos), and we played like complete poo in games that we won but shouldnt have (Redskins, Raiders, and the last 3 quarters vs the Eagles). I feel like the Panthers are one of the only teams in the league that I wouldnt be surprised if they went 5-11 or 11-5. They are absolutely impossible to predict.

That being said, i dont care how good our DBs look against Armanti or Ginn, I feel Juilo, Colston, and the like will abuse them. Plus our right side of the line is atrocious and I think im the only one on this forum who remembers just how terrible our DLine was last year amd theres no way I feel Star magically fixes that. Better? Yes. Good enough to lead us on a playoff run? No way. Just throwing a number out there, i say 8-8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predict a season with 16 regular season games with a win total between 9 & 11 games. It doesn't all come down to Cam like most of the so called experts predict. If the running game is clicking this team will be seriously dangerous. I'm not so worried about the secondary of the defense because I think the front 7 will be very strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strength of schedule isn't a good indicator of a teams success. It isn't really a good indicator of anything.

 

I know...teams are different year to year, but it still plays in the heads of any competitor whether they want to admit it or not. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This team is going to make a lot of the "experts" look stupid this season.....even though making many of them look stupid is not really that big of a task.

Although this board has its share of idiots and I can be one of them once in a while), I find that there are some people here (you being one of them) who know football and the panthers better than the "experts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...