Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FP's Observations


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

I'm going to focus on some areas that aren't quite as evident as who caught what or tackled whom.

- Outside of one big hiccup from the 3rd stringers, the secondary did a great job in not letting receivers get wide open. Considering the number of times we'd watch players running free on the back end last year it was very encouraging to see them limit the big plays and generally keep the ball in front of them.

- Although they missed some stunt and run blitz pickups the offensive line generated a good push and made holes for the running backs until the third string came in, at which point Chicago was trying to generate pass pressure and crowding the line of scrimmage.

- The kickoff and punt return coverage teams did a good job and held their lanes much better than in previous preseasons. I still remember Rainey's two TD returns on us last preseason, and even though they were called back they still showed how poor those units were. There wasn't any of that last night, so that's a positive.

- I want to single out Kawann Short for playing very well. His burst and nimbleness seems to have translated to the next level and he was a split second away from several sacks or tackles for loss. You can see the stress he puts on the offensive line, they started to double him up later in the game.

- Although the offense was obviously pretty vanilla, it had purpose and didn't abandon the run at the first chance it got. Outside of one or two plays with the first team, Cam generally got to the line with 10-12 seconds to spare, much better than the 6-8 average of the last few years. The more time Cam has to survey the defense the better his pre-snap reads will be. To make a positive from a negative, on Cam's INT the play call gave him options on multiple levels of the field: my worry regarding Shula's play call history is that he would utilize obvious plays in short down situations, but at least in this instance it was a call that put pressure on the defense rather than vice versa. Too bad Cam went conservative here, lol.

- Barner should carry a football all week, because he flashed too well to not have a major impact on this team. The transitition to the NFL requires an understanding that defenders are always looking for ways to rip the ball away, and Kenjon seemed to take exception to one of the Bears defenders pulling at his arms after the play was over. It's just how this level is, rook. On the positive side, he limited his dancing and made good cuts between defenders and followed his blocks well. You can tell he is working to allay his pre-draft criticisms.

- Finally, I think it's apparent that Rivera isn't holding back as the head coach anymore; he was very outspoken on the field and communicated directly to his players. If this persists what will we do with our stoic Ron GIFs? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kenyon  :blink:.   I like the idea of Kenjon carrying the ball all week.

 

I'm not too keen on our defensive efficiency on that slant though. There were a few times (perhaps mostly with the third stringers) that I was holding my breath because it seemed like we were a missed tackle away from being burned. But we didn't, for the most part, and that's all good.  I suspect we'll do better next week.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can expect there to be blown plays when you are mixing and matching guys in the secondary through out the game.  It takes time to develop chemistry and know what each other is going to do in a particular situation. Then new guys come in and everything has to develop again.  

As long as the starters are making plays, the rest is just game experience for the backups so when they are put in the rotation they will fill in.  Overall I was pleased with their performance for a first game.  Lets see where we go from here before deciding how they will be this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally speaking, I was very pleased with what I saw, too. I understand this was just the first preseason match up, but if I were to nitpick, I would address the following:

 

- Tackling - it's improved from last year, but some of the guys are still trying to throw a shoulder and bowl the ball carrier over. That doesn't work often enough. The only sure way to make a tackle is to wrap the carrier up and ride him to the ground. It's hard to unlearn bad habits, but here's to hoping the young guys can do it. 

 

- Underneath coverages - yeah, we were dicey on those slant plays, but really, that's why the slant is so popular, because it's hard to defend. Still, if we can tighten up our defense underneath, maybe we can at least limit the damage it does us.

 

That's the two big buggaboos I saw last night - or at least the ones that seem to be sticking in my head. Over all, I was ecstatic with the way we played. I think most of the mistakes we saw were a result of shaking off the rust of a long off season and being under the lights against a real opponent for the first time since the start of the year. I think we're just going to get better as we go along, and I have a really good feeling that we're going to give the Seahawks all they can handle on September 8!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two takeaways from last night.

1. Very few penalties and we played very disciplined.

2. 4 turnovers and we still won.

All in all, a very encouraging start to the year.

 

Both are excellent points, and I forgot to mention the penalties. I was VERY impressed with the few number of penalties (5) for the first preseason game, as that has been a sore area as well in the past. That speaks well to the preparation and focus by both the players and coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both are excellent points, and I forgot to mention the penalties. I was VERY impressed with the few number of penalties (5) for the first preseason game, as that has been a sore area as well in the past. That speaks well to the preparation and focus by both the players and coaches.

Even the bottom of the roster played well. Offense, Defense, even ST. I give a lot of the credit to the staff, and of course Rivera. They had this team ready to play. And it showed.

I think this bodes well for the season. If we can play this well during preseason, the regular season should be a snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- I want to single out Kawann Short for playing very well. His burst and nimbleness seems to have translated to the next level and he was a split second away from several sacks or tackles for loss. You can see the stress he puts on the offensive line, they started to double him up later in the game.

 

This +1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nice.  Allar is intriguing.  He's a medical red flag.  I'm not sure when he would be available.  However, we aren't moving off Bryce at least until '27, so he'd have time.  I'd be shocked if Young is not our starting QB next year.The OL needs some reinforcement, I agree . Moton's contract is a beast as well as the guards we signed in FA.  Corbett is hurt all the time and BC is nice depth, but a mediocre starter.  Defense is a must.  You hit some critical areas--Edge, LB, CB.  I would like to see another safety as well.
    • I don’t know how people could not see it. I am no draft scout and never claimed to be.  It is a situation where when you look at him, what does he have physically that is better than NFL average? Nothing that I could see.  Not foot speed. Not arm strength.  Then you look at his size and it is well below all but Murray in my memory for the modern NFL era.  Murray has the plus athleticism/quickness and a plus  arm. I still wouldn’t want him because of his size.   But Bryce had none of that to offset his size.  So okay now that I have assessed Bryce I don’t want him. It was a simple checklist. Except I see all this talk that they might take him. So now I decide I need to look at him closer.  Pro day video… I see what I called a skip step. A little extra move on the deep pass. I look at the velocity of his throws, NFL average is being kind. I look at that footwork and it is big time wonky.  So there you are, lower ball velocity in my opinion   That adds time in a league where guys are timed down to the 100th of a second. Not a plus. It is questionable. Then the extra move on the deep balls which is time, in the face of pressure, and space, also in the face of pressure…  it is a stack of negatives and the guy had nothing athletically to offset it. And it is the 1.1 of the NFL draft where there has  never been a successful player with his attributes at his position, in the modern era.  In his case you don’t have to be a super scout. You just had to look and think about him in relationship to the NFL game.    I never watched him in college and think that prevented me from rationalizing things. I had no bias in that regard and I believe others might have.    Combine that with a personal opinion that the SEC is not the NFL and there was no automatic approval  because of the level of competition level he faced….    On that front I feel there are single digit examples of guys who truly could be in the NFL in their final year of college. The freaks. The rest of them… take what they were their fist NFL camp and give the a season in the league and an offseason with the resources and standards of NFL conditioning and strength programs and compare them to a year before… you will see a difference. And they aren’t finished growing either so that plays into it.  It is was a bunch of factors that just equaled do not do this. It gets a lot harder if he had the size to measure up to these normal prospects with the prototypical physiques, and the cannon arm, etc. I never could claim to be good at eyeballing comparisons between two players like that.   Bryce was such a unique situation. Anyway that was the process.   Looking at guys that people compared him to was also informative, since Brees was the big one. And if you honestly look at Brees and his size, people comparing the two like they are 1 to 1, it was smoke. I am always suspicious of smoke blowing, when I find it.  Saying I was not special I just used my brain and eyes and they are not special either. So I had a very hard time understanding what people were thinking. 
×
×
  • Create New...