Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Notice the media slowly building Cam up?


Zod

Recommended Posts

I've not seen anything positive.  Please give examples.  The only thing I saw this weekend was on NFLN they did a blowthrough on the weekend's games, and they only showed one play(the int) from our game while saying something like, "can't do that Cam".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the right way for the media to cover the panthers? Since it seems like we bitch whenever they diss us, ignore us, or hype us up.

 

 

Just some good ol' fashion journalistic integrity is all I ask. 

 

That includes not doing the following:

 

- pulling quotes out of context a la Peter King "entertainer and icon" tweet

 

- sensationalizing a la SVP saying Cam is just a "me me me guy" or Cowherd saying Cam may be a bust after he breaks nearly every rookie QB record in the books

 

- taking blatant cheap shots at a player or team a la Prisco's probowl article one year late or NFL.com which has taken shot after shot on the Panthers and Cam this offseason

 

I get that a large portion of media now a days only cares about ratings.  They literally will say or write anything just to get a rise out of people.

 

The rest of the national media are really just bandwagoners.  They don't have the effort or will to pay attention to small market teams like Carolina, so they just follow each other's tails wherever that may lead them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As predicted, they are starting to build Cam up. The only thing they like more than tearing an athlete down, is a story of redemption while building him up again.

 

fug the national media (most of them anyway)! They have lost ALL credibility when it comes to covering Cam Newton. We don't need any Johnny-come-latelys telling us what we already know and knew.  Lucky for them,  they are dealing with a gracious and classy kid who naturally displays decorum and sweet southern charm because he's really that guy.  If it were me, I'd be saying "Oh, now you wanna get on the bandwagon?  Like Martin always says, 'Get to steppin!'"

 

 

 

Furthermore, they are ready to Pearl Harbor him at a moment's notice. I'll never trust them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...