Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A couple thoughts about our preseason offense


CRA

Recommended Posts

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda agree. I mean Fua played forever with the first team. I haven't seen many screens to take advantage of the blitzing defenders either. We will see a bit more game 3 of preseason because the team needs some offensive production and confidence, but we won't be doing anything cutting edge and innovative until week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

1st time I've agreed with you in a long time.

 

We've shown nothing and pretty much ran vanilla stuff to evaluate players.

 

No QB dives, Bootlegs or Play action in the Red Zone. All are parts of our Red Zone packages.

 

No Read option or Smoke screens to Smitty which are a big part of this offense.

 

Vanilla Zone and Man coverage with simple blitzes and Dline stunts on Defense. We all know Mcdermont and Rivera got more schemes for this defense then they are showing in the preseason.

 

If people would take the time and look they would see we are showing nothing in this preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Huddle. Some folks understand what is going on. Some are worried they are seeing a precursor to the regular season. Nothing anyone says will change anybodies mind.

 

I can only recall 2 screens. Both to Barner, and both from DA. Our RBs catch plenty of passes when our O is clicking.

 

We have used zero misdirection, read option, or anything other than off tackle or up the gut.

 

We are using no motion and running basic routes.

 

In other words. Our O is as vanilla as it can get.

 

On D, we are mixing and matching personnel with an eye on evaluation. Very few blitzes or stunts.

 

Running basic cover 2 and zone. Very little man to man, or bump and run. Putting no pressure on the CBs.

 

In short. The D is pretty much as vanilla as it can get.

 

tldr version. It is the preseason. We are evaluating. It sucks for fans. But it is important for the coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st time I've agreed with you in a long time.

 

We've shown nothing and pretty much ran vanilla stuff to evaluate players.

 

No QB dives, Bootlegs or Play action in the Red Zone. All are parts of our Red Zone packages.

 

No Read option or Smoke screens to Smitty which are a big part of this offense.

 

Vanilla Zone and Man coverage with simple blitzes and Dline stunts on Defense. We all know Mcdermont and Rivera got more schemes for this defense then they are showing in the preseason.

 

If people would take the time and look they would see we are showing nothing in this preseason.

Beat me to it. Well said anyway. Bastar.... lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Huddle. Some folks understand what is going on. Some are worried they are seeing a precursor to the regular season. Nothing anyone says will change anybodies mind.

 

I can only recall 2 screens. Both to Barner, and both from DA. Our RBs catch plenty of passes when our O is clicking.

 

We have used zero misdirection, read option, or anything other than off tackle or up the gut.

 

We are using no motion and running basic routes.

 

In other words. Our O is as vanilla as it can get.

 

On D, we are mixing and matching personnel with an eye on evaluation. Very few blitzes or stunts.

 

Running basic cover 2 and zone. Very little man to man, or bump and run. Putting no pressure on the CBs.

 

In short. The D is pretty much as vanilla as it can get.

 

tldr version. It is the preseason. We are evaluating. It sucks for fans. But it is important for the coaches.

 

Hubby gets it. Good post a lot more in dept then mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hubby gets it. Good post a lot more in dept then mine.

You covered it well enough. Petty amazing we both pretty much said the same thing at pretty much the same time though.

I saw this thread started by CRA and was not expecting a rational well thought out post that didn't have any negative connotations to it. I was thinking, here we go again.

But hey, even CRA gets it. Who'd a thunk it. Just kidding.

I know the players want to win. The coaches do as well. But I also know that finding out who can, or can't, do what, is more important. Unfortunately, most fans see the bad, and that is what they take away from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You covered it well enough. Petty amazing we both pretty much said the same thing at pretty much the same time though.

I saw this thread started by CRA and was not expecting a rational well thought out post that didn't have any negative connotations to it. I was thinking, here we go again.

But hey, even CRA gets it. Who'd a thunk it. Just kidding.

I know the players want to win. The coaches do as well. But I also know that finding out who can, or can't, do what, is more important. Unfortunately, most fans see the bad, and that is what they take away from it.

 

Yeah crazy concept. Trying to evaluate players at the bottom of your roster in games that don't count.

 

 

 

Side Note: I thought CRA was going that way when I saw the thread 1st to.

 

It's nice to see him looking at it in terms of what a actual Coaching staff looks for in the Preseason.

 

I can see the difference in the Gettlemen's influence to Preseason compare to Hurney's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

Very well said. The deal with preseason is to see who can play the right way. Who can fight through blocks the right way, who stays in the right lanes, who can make the right block, who runs the right route the right way, and most importantly, who can do their job the right way?

Keeping the plays simple is the best way to evaluate. That way the coaches know exactly what they are looking at/for. They are looking for players that can get the job done, and do it the right way.

Some teams use preseason as practice. They run all their plays and don't care who knows it. Rivera is old school, as you well know, he likes to keep it simple and evaluate every player from a small pool of plays. Not running a hundred plays makes evaluation easier.

Ah hellz, its late. I'm done preaching. Good thread starter. Even if it was not expected. I really thought you were going to find something negative to harp over. Thanks for a thread worth getting involved in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wanted to jump into this thread. Although I do not post anymore I do look in as there are a few old friends around. Loved hearing some of the names you mentioned.  Another  oldie is NanceUSMC.  He is the one who got me here from the old Observer forum.  Good guy and smart football guy. I have learned a lot from a lot of good Huddlers over the years, Over time. we have sadly lost a few who left this earth too soon.  Anyone who know of someone, it would be nice to try to make a list.  One of the more recent, CosmoGirl,  was someone that kind of hit hard.  Life sucks sometimes. Some of the best times were when we had our own tailgate and could meet up in person.  I think it made us better. Several dedicated volunteers, lead by LiverMush, started setting things up in the wee hours of each gameday morning.  Don't know all those regulars but I remember JakeFlake was one.  For you newbies...each game,  a Huddler (or a group) sponsored the food for each tailgate.  Eating was free but a donation was asked for.  At the end of the year those donations were used to buy bicycles for Toys for Tots.  Over the years Huddlers bought a lot of new bikes for kids for Christmas.  (I am guessing a couple of hundred each year.)  We had a good time getting together, got to make friends in person, and then got to feel like you were doing something good. It was truly a community. I got to meet Dan Morgan at one of our tailgates...he brought pizza from his restaurant.  How many of you remember that?  Glad the restaurant did not make it....lol. Not only have people changed, and come and gone.....but the entire nature and purpose has changed. Nothing lasts forever and we move on but we still like to think about good times. Same reason we take pictures. Want to ask a question I have not seen anyone else mention......who remembers    "The Couch" ?  We have argued, laughed, lived the ups and downs of football and dealt with a little real life along the way.  A thanks to  the Mods who keep this going.  I am sure they sacrifice a lot of their time out of love for the forum and the Panthers. Take care my friends and be well.  I will close with my new favorite quote which I think is greatly needed in these difficult times.        
    • My top-5 JAGS: 1. Tommy Tremble: May not ever be top-tier, but has been solid and you never doubt the effort. 2. Cade Mays: Not bad for a 6th rounder. Hated to see him go. 3. Brady Christensen: One of the most versatile backup OLs in the NFL. Hopefully we re-sign him. 4. Trevis Gipson: Quietly was really solid depth last season. Glad we brought him back. 5. Brycen Tremayne: Has been solid depth at WR, flashing at times last year.
    • He wasn't a JAG, he's been a starter every year of his career. Didn't turn into the superstar it seemed like he might his rookie year, but I think part of that has been being misused. Guy was/is a baller.
×
×
  • Create New...