Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Seahawks have a first year DC and their 2 best pass rushers are out...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Guest Spider Monkey

"10AM East Coast game"

"Any given Sunday"

"Seahawks missing numerous key players"

"Looking ahead to matchup with 49ers"

"Panthers played out of their minds, they'll come back down to reality"

"Cam had one good game. Big deal. He will collapse."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope they don't need those guys against the Panthers is what I've been hearing

 

Time will tell but I do believe we have the talent to beat them if we have the right offensive package.

I certainly feel we have upgraded our defense in a meaningful way and that should be apparent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope they don't need those guys against the Panthers is what I've been hearing

 

Time will tell but I do believe we have the talent to beat them if we have the right offensive package.

I certainly feel we have upgraded our defense in a meaningful way and that should be apparent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the exact time that I would want to play Seattle. They're missing several key players, and one player who will be playing hurt, and they have yet to really see our offense.

 

Not to mention it's a 10am game for them, and they have been sluggish in the past playing at that time.

 

We're really only missing Stewart, and we're loaded at RB.

 

And our defense is red hot right now, with possibly the best front 7 we've ever had.

 

The o-line is not as bad as it appeared in the preseason. They were making mental errors that led to the pressure on Cam. They can clean that up. Williams got a play call wrong and totally whiffed on a pass rusher and didn't even touch him, and that led to a Cam sack, but had he got the play right and locked on he would have been fine. No excuses. This has to be a win.

 

If you listen to the national media you would think we were playing the hot damn 85' Bears or 89' 49ers.

 

This is same mediocre offense we faced last season, with little Russy Wilson who can barely see over his overrated lummox center. Their POS dink an dunk 13 points in 4 quarters offense should be eaten alive by Keek and our pass rush. More passes equates to more opportunities to make a play and strip the ball and deal out punishment when you're where you need to be. Our LBs corps are the best the NFL, and it's time to show it.

 

And it's not like their defense is the Steer Curtain or something. They have big DBs? WOW! Nice gimmick. We have an expert WR with a low center of gravity who runs pinpoint routes like a god and should make the HOF.

 

Dear RR, you have the defensive players you wanted, and you're a defensive genius, and facing a weak offense. No excuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...