Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Balancing Our Offense Will Be A Fine Art

TylerDurden

By TylerDurden,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

If we're even able to do it successfully.

Why?

Aside from the obvious reasons, the general premise isn't breaking news, but the game has dramatically changed. As has been discussed ad nauseam here, "3 yards and a cloud of dust" philosophies aren't just outdated now, they're ancient.

Look at the stats from yesterday's opening day games and the picture becomes that much clearer...

Can you guess the league's leading rusher?

Terrelle Pryor. A QB. He ran for 112 yards.

Now another interesting stat. Shane Vereen was the only RB in the league to eclipse the 100 yard mark in week 1.

Wow, we picked a good time to invest boat loads of money in a football philosophical dinosaur.

So, I certainly hope Shula plans to utilize our RBs to our advantage without handicapping our offense's ability to make big plays in the passing game. He must find the right balance between using Cam to his maximum potential in the passing game while utilizing him effectively in running situations along with our RBs without turning our offense into a Woody Hayes' wet dream.

I have to say, I was not happy with the lack of designed runs for Cam yesterday. His ability to run on designed plays often is the difference between scoring or sending out the punting unit on any given drive. I hope to see more of that going forward b/c the beauty of Cam is the pressure he puts on a defense with his potential for big plays passing or running is invaluable. Shula must find that balance. There's a time for buckling your chin strap and using a show of force running the ball, but it doesn't require you to abandon what makes your offense successful and dynamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want to them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Unfortunately, he is the only one I trust with short yardage situations.  Although, Tolbert grinded one out.  There was some pretty nice designs in there that were executed well, but plenty blahs that weren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cary Kollins Experienced

Cary Kollins

Posted
Posted

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
  • Author
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

But that's why Cam's designed runs are so crucial. They don't require him to be a "battering ram." In my observations, his biggest gains come from designed runs out of pistol and/or spread formations. There wasn't nearly enough of those in there yesterday. We don't need him to run straight into a pile of defenders out of a goal line formation. He needs to operate with the chance that the pass could be coming, which is what makes him so dangerous to defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Collaborator

teeray

Posted
Posted

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

I care more about first downs than who is getting paid what

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kdrh5 Newbie

kdrh5

Posted
Posted

I don't think we have any excuses to not be able to put points on the board for our defense. Green Bay has an offensive line full of no-names. I can't remember when Pittsburgh was ever good at pass protecting. San Francisco, like us, has one great, yet aging slot receiver, a juiced up tight end as their number two option, and a bunch of guys, yet their QB just passed for 10,000 yards yesterday. There are plenty of winning teams with holes in their rosters just as big, if not bigger than ours, but they have success in spite of. That needs to change here and I expect better on Sundays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I also thought the HB screens were underutilized as well.

And as far as Cam, I also think they've been telling him to get down quicker which makes me think that using him as a runner is something they're trying to deemphasize and avoid. There were a few times when he did run yesterday that it appeared he dropped voluntarily a lot quicker than he ever did before, even when the first down was within reach. He appears to be avoiding contact as much as possible, which is smart, but I think it signals a shift in overall philosophy as far as how they want to use him this season... And that, I don't like

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Later in the game Cam ran some power runs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...