Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles @ Skins


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Eagles look so rejuvenated and energetic against Washington right now, in all three phases. sucks we haven't seen that out of our team in at least ten years, but I guess that's because their owner thinks outside the box

Hey but we get to watch Ron blow all three timeouts and the clock with the ball right before halftime every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Eagles were playing a real team, they would be losing. The Redskins' pass rush has gotten better through out the game. But their DBs suck and their O can't sustain a drive.

Well, maybe. I was under the impression Skins were a decent team. But we will see, but I am impressed by the Eagles so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys can talk trash all you want, but the Eagles will have to be dealt with.

This new offense is going to be the talk of the league after this game. DC's will have nightmares.

Barring injuries, the Eagles will take the NFC East

Was impressed when the Panthers played em in preseason. We had nothing for em either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys can talk trash all you want, but the Eagles will have to be dealt with.

This new offense is going to be the talk of the league after this game. DC's will have nightmares.

Barring injuries, the Eagles will take the NFC East

 

overreaction.

 

the redskins offensive ineptitude is as much to blame for this score. they turned the ball over twice and and multiple 3 and outs.

 

this offense is crazy to watch, but im not going to pass judgment until more games are played

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...