Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike. M (like i know who that is) thoughts on our Offensive philosphy/ Cam


TbTeRRoR

Recommended Posts

http://www.wralsportsfan.com/carolina-s-offense-not-suited-for-newton-s-strengths/12884414/

 

 

 

"It’s probably too late for coordinator Mike Shula to install a new offense, but if head coach Ron Rivera wants to save his job, it is a risk worth taking.

If not, they will be watching the new coaching staff installing that offense around Newton next year."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy probably doesn't realize this is the same offense we have been running for 2 years and Newton has put up record pace rushing numbers and doing it all.

Lets completely disregard we have only played one game.....against the best secondary and one of the fastest sideline to sideline D's. You have to limit yourself if you want to compete with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why won't fans and analysts WAIT to watch this Sunday's game before we crucify? 125 yards and 7 points appears very discouraging on the surface but I like the looks the offense got and how accurate (other than two passes) and composed Cam appeared in the pocket.

 

It's called PTSD from last year's "fool me once..."  

 

That's not so hard to understand.  Win this week and next without looking offensively anemic, and the first game's offensive malaise is but a bad memory---a hiccup towards the post-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the concern but I think it's far too late to change the offense now. Furthermore, while Cam didn't take any deep shots down the field, I feel a bit optimistic about the playcalling. I think we're simply lacking chemistry.

 

Chemistry and at least real talent on the oline...I'm hoping Shula can break Cam of his bad reading habits but that ship may have already sailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad reading? His first touchdown came via a blitz he recognized pre-snap. Hell, his touchdown last week against The Seahawks was a thing of beauty. He needs to improve a tad more but young QBs tend to lock onto their favorite targets. Kaepernick and RG3 are prime examples.

 

 

I was referring to his locking-on tendencies, yes.  I will always love me some 89, but there are times Lafell is open that Cam just doesn't register.  Going to be interesting to see how we address OL and WR in the offseason since both could really use high picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good article. It's a terrible feeling watching how San Fran uses Kaepernick, knowing we could do that and more. Instead we're stuck with Shula and a legion of good ole boy fans who still think "pound the rock and hit  'em with play action! that's how you win right thur derp!"

 

Such a shame Cam's talent is being wasted as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell being ignored at times makes me question the connection between him and Cam. They appear to be on the same page in one week but not the following. I feel he's not as confident in Brandon as he is in Olsen or Smitty. His chemistry with Edwards, Hixon and Ginn could be much worse.

Agreed, we need both. I wonder who goes first and if we move up to acquire either one.

LaFell was Cams 3rd read on most plays. As has been said before Cam does not have time to make it to his 3rd read. That's coaching, not Can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article and a lot of the talk about what the Panthers need to do on offense is garbage.  So basically this article wants the same scheme as last season or similar??   If I recall, myself and many others, at least here in Panther land were calling for a more traditional offense.  That read options, as a base offense was crap.  I for one, LIKED, the formations seen last weekend.  It was not perfect and without a doubt the offense needs to open things up, etc .... but maybe I am not seeing these other game right, but it sure looked like to me all these other "running QB's" except for maybe RG III , looked really good in the pocket.  Then if anything they make things happen when they scramble.  That is the kind of QB Cam will and can excel at.  Let him pass the ball, learn how to run an offense and use his legs when he needs to.     

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...