Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve and Lafell looking at the playbook...


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Maybe Cam was off so much because they were running the wrong routes? Lafell didn't even know where to line-up one play. I even recall the camera on Cam on the sideline talking to Lafell and Smitty going over the Playbook.

jLD2B.St.138.jpeg

Carolina Panthers wide receivers (89) Steve Smith and (11) Brandon LaFell look over information on the team's sideline during first quarter action vs the Buffalo Bills at Ralph Wilson Stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that talk about gettis being cut bc he didn't know the route in pre season. So cut lafell. Don't wanna beat a dead horse though.

Just hope lafell improves. Would be nice to see him play at least a few games this year. We haven't seen him yet

Would have to go back and watch....but that mix up may have been Cam influenced. I think Cam pointed him incorrectly bc he ended up on the other side from where Cam said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that talk about gettis being cut bc he didn't know the route in pre season. So cut lafell. Don't wanna beat a dead horse though.

Just hope lafell improves. Would be nice to see him play at least a few games this year. We haven't seen him yet

Thought the same thing... At least Gettis had speed. LaFell has been such a disappointment and is completely unreliable as a #2. He should've had that TD on Sunday and just dropped it... SSDD. I'm hoping they'll give Hixon a shot at the 2 this Sunday. I'm tired of seeing LaFell's inconsistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...