Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Know Ye This


Zod

Recommended Posts

1. We are in DEFCON 4. The site is running bare bones because I feel there is no way to avoid a major melt down or extreme rejoicing today.

 

2. People who create moronic threads out of emotion will be banned. No one is interested in your 3 word topic in all caps.

 

3. The Chat Room is open. Click chat up top.

 

4. General game observations go in the gameday thread. Trust us, they are not worthy of its own thread.

 

5. Creating halftime threads with thoughts on the entire half are fine, provided they are of value. Again, 3 word topics get you banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was actually hoping for rain today. would have benefited the Panthers. Thankfully, I'm not going up against Nicks or Cruz in my FFL. Going to be interesting to see how the coaching staff responds to the pressure. 

 

I also just want to point out the colossal disappointment David Wilson has been for the Gmen so far this season. I'm predicting 90 yards and 2 tds today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...