Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason traded?

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

The NFL Shield At Midfield Grand Master

The NFL Shield At Midfield

Posted
Posted

 

Sounds like Beason wanted the trade:

 

Joe Person ‏@josephperson 1m
Takeaway from Rivera's comments: Beason wanted to be a starter, asked for that opportunity in a professional manner. #Panthers accommodated.

 

 

oh man, gettleman sure is an idiot for this trade.  he could have at least gotten hakeem nicks, victor cruz, and jason pierre-paul and the giants' first round pick for a guy like beason!

 

something something eugene monroe

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheMaulClaw Mentor

TheMaulClaw

Posted
Posted

Well there's nothing still on the Panther's site.  I know they probably won't publish anything until a physical has been passed and so forth.   But it still gives me hope as far as what we're receiving out of the deal.  Everything else is here say.  I would throw in an extra pick to land Hicks though.  Beason and a 4th for Hicks and a 6th.  I would do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swaggasaurus Rising Star

Swaggasaurus

Posted
Posted

I think this is kinda sad. I doubt we will get anything worthwhile in return. Have we ever? Just trading away Peppers, Mushin. Beason is still a fuging beast. He will probably become huge in NY. If we do not get hicks Ill just cry. 

We didn't trade Peppers or Moose..We cut Hicks before the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seal (SmittyIsOurSavior) Newbie

Seal (SmittyIsOurSavior)

Posted
Posted

Seriously doubt it.

Objectively speaking, Gettleman's NYG ties probably got us a better deal than others might have offered.

Love Beason, but you gotta realize the rest of the league doesn't view him through sentimental Panther fan eyes.

Well I also think almost any league GM would take Beason over a 7th rounder with a 15% chance of that 7th rounder being even a decent backup. Maybe I'm using the wrong form of logic though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...