Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stopping Newton - The Word is Out


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dont know who all saw it but Cam even had Rodney Harrison and Coach Dungy (Harrison actually said it) saying Cam needed to be on a different NFL team...on national tv.

This will eventually come back to haunt this team - somebody will end up offering more than we can with our cap problems and we'll be minus our QB.

Management better sit up and take notice - get something/someone going or we'll be right back to 2010 in the blink of an eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His point was the Panthers are not utilizing Cam as they should...not the most insightful analysis as its obvious to anyone, but im glad he said it on air...

 

 

Actually, Harrison said:  " It is time for the Carolina Panthers to switch quarterbacks".

 

That was the quote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

isn't the forumula for beating teams with a swiss cheese line is to blitz and blitz and blitz and just in case blitz more until the other team figures out what to do?

 

now Cam doesn't help his cause much by treating the football like a newborn baby and he wants to hold it until it takes a dump. get outside the tackles and throw it away dude.

 

stuff like that is part of my post yesterday. this team simply can't overcome ANY mistakes it makes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL Bench Cam.

 

What the fug ever, these people are fuging idiots.

 

This guy is held to such an INSANE standard.

 

If he plays like poo for another 3 weeks, sure, talk about benching him

 

But he had the best start of his career, passing wise, and we want to bench him after a bad game?

 

Why do I feel like people think he is some 10 year vet?  Uggh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL Bench Cam.

What the fug ever, these people are fuging idiots.

This guy is held to such an INSANE standard.

If he plays like poo for another 3 weeks, sure, bench him

But he had the best start of his career, passing wise, and we want to bench him after a bad game?

Why do I feel like people think he is some 10 year vet? Uggh.

It's Rodney Harrison.

What would you expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed to me like our big go to the long developing plays and quit that productive up tempo playcalling move coincided perfectly with their spy and send the house agenda.  And like our decision to do so was written in stone and the coaches were standing around staring at the carved tablet for 20 minutes while shaking their head at the bad decision they could not go back and change and the terrible luck we were saddled with because of it... we watched the Cardinals feast on the Panthers.

 

that sh-t was dumb

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...