Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What this franchise needs.


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

[Edit: wow looking at the current threads, I haven't seen the board go this full retard before]

This may be uber-obvious, but it's cathartic so bear with me.

1) Fire the entire coaching staff.

2) Find a Number #1 WR through free agency. Smith is no longer a #1. While we are at it, draft a WR in the first two rounds.

3) Find offensive line help. Draft. Free Agency. Doesn't matter just bring in the fugging reinforcements.

This team isn't far off. But the changes must happen, and they start at the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's impossible to disagree.

 

at this point i believe gettleman wanted to get rid of rivera and start new. gettleman's boss had other plans, and wanted to give rivera another year. to stay on his good side, gettleman did JUST ENOUGH to make it appear as if we were trying to "win now." behind the scenes, however, gettleman was creating cap space and carrying it over for when he finds a real coach.

 

 

i do hope this organization has the balls to fire rivera mid season, even if there is no shot at the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...