Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Minnesota - Land o' lakes and bearded women


SCP

Recommended Posts

OK, so my boys go out to the desert and lay an embarrassing egg and all of a sudden poo has hit the fan again in the Queen City. Nobody cares but us, so fug it. Time to move on. Up next for the Fightin' Rivera's are the purple drag queens known as the Vikings. Did you know that Viking is an old Norse term derived from vikingr meaning "seafaring woman with penis". The more you know. Good ol' Minnesota. The land of 10,000 lakes, 8 million white people, a few thousand Ojibwe Indians, and 78 black guys thanks to the NBA Timberwolves and Vikings. The land that actually voted a pro wrestler into office. A land that claims a big ass mall with a roller coaster and 72 Sbarro's as the #1 reason to visit Minneapolis. In Minnesota men are men and women are men. They say things like "You betcha" after ordering a cheeseburger. All the while their neighbors to the northeast and southeast are winning football games and Lombardi's. The Vikings have been around for 70 + years and have yet to hoist a Lombardi. It must really suck to have to listen to a bunch of fat cheese eating losers from Wisconsin brag about all their trophies while you float in a cess pool of mediocrity with a white collar criminal named Zygi as an owner. No, as a Panther fan I don't have any room to brag, and I'm not. I mean I like Minnesota. Joe Mauer was great on my fantasy baseball team this year and I love 3M products especially Post It notes and those new things they make to hang poo on my walls without nails. I mean without Minnesotans, Myrtle Beach and those 24/7/365 Christmas stores would probably go out of business. I think your little Skol Viking Skol fight song is a bit strange. I think skol is Danish for "good cheer" but your team is in Minnesota. How about Go Vikings Go? Just a suggestion. Love it or leave it.

As for your running back. Thanks to the modern science of HGH, AP was able to make a stunning return and rush for 2000+ yards last year. He is arguably the best RB of my generation but he has never seen what he is about to see this Sunday. A three letter assassain named Fua. Fua is an acronym with many meanings but this Sunday it stands for fugin Up Adrian. After this Sunday, Fua is going to have a pasta dish named after him at one of the many Sbarro's in Mall of America.

Panthers 28

Vikings 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After this Sunday, Fua is going to have a pasta dish named after him at one of the many Sbarro's in Mall of America.

 

 

Hopefully because he will be spending the game at Sbarros eating all the pasta they have, while the real DTs on this team contain AP :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...