Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Could Dave Gettleman's plans for the Panthers future not include Cam Newton"


PantherPhann89

Recommended Posts

am I the only one that thinks this is a flawed and retarded comparison?

 

this might be valid if there were anywhere near as many teams using "non" "true pocket passers" as "true pocket passers."

 

you have to make plays from the pocket as a QB but the idea that you have to exclusively make them from the pocket is ridiculous....

 

And as someone pointed out in another thread (or earlier in this one), true pocket passers are nothing more than QB's that can't run. So the only thing separating Cam from those guys is he can actually use his legs as a weapon. I can't for the life of me figure out why that's a bad thing.

 

The new breed of QBs that can run well and pass well are tough to defend. The D often has to use a spy, effectively giving them 1 less defender than when they face a conventional offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to illustrate my point, if we list the total number of teams using "non-true-pocket-passers"startes, and list the teams with "true pocket passers" as starters, take a guess which list would be like oh five times larger...

This post right here is why some people should not post. Welcome to a clusterfug. To illustrate my point if we list the total number of prototypical LBs starting on NFL teams compared to non prototypical guess what's larger. In other words we should trade Luke while he still has some value. I mean you see what happened with that Thomas Davis guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

am I the only one that thinks this is a flawed and retarded comparison?

 

this might be valid if there were anywhere near as many teams using "non" "true pocket passers" as "true pocket passers."

 

you have to make plays from the pocket as a QB but the idea that you have to exclusively make them from the pocket is ridiculous....

I agree, it's not an accurate comparison, but what else do we have to compare it to. We have had "quote, un quote " running QB'S in the league before Cam, without a great deal of success. I think that DG just wants to win and is entertaining many different thoughts as how to make that happen. Cam can win with the right game plan and help. Instead of trying to make him a straight pocket passer, get an    o-line that can hold a pocket, call quicker developing pass routes and let Cam run when there's nothing there. Even this plan won't work every game, no plan will, you have to be able to adapt and this is our Achilles Hill...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh and bring up something touchy can anyone name a black qb who didn't run???? for the most part the real difference is the ones who can pass and the ones who can't, Cam uses his legs to extend plays and occasionally scrambles Vick and RG3 scramble more but still uses there legs to extend plays. it's just a added threat, doesn't make those guys less of a passer just cause they scramble occasionally and don't stay in the pocket

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh and bring up something touchy can anyone name a black qb who didn't run???? for the most part the real difference is the ones who can pass and the ones who can't, Cam uses his legs to extend plays and occasionally scrambles Vick and RG3 scramble more but still uses there legs to extend plays. it's just a added threat, doesn't make those guys less of a passer just cause they scramble occasionally and don't stay in the pocket

 

Warren Moon.

 

Comparing their best years rushing-wise, Troy Aikman ran for more yards than Warren.

 

Do you think Troy Aikman was a "running QB"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warren Moon.

 

Comparing their best years rushing-wise, Troy Aikman ran for more yards than Warren.

 

Do you think Troy Aikman was a "running QB"?

 

my point, people are so quick to label Cam as a running qb instead of a dual threat type of guy because there lazy, just like rg3, just like mcnair, just like cunnigham, ect when in reality the guys they compare them to are not similar to them your vince young, tebows, joe webb, troy smith ect all were lacking in the passing game.

 

but to answer your question no i don't, i see him as a dual threat just like i see Steve young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can give 2 shyts about 10 of 12 QB are pocket QBs.  Cam is a rare QB but his style is changing the game.  You cannot change the spots on a leopard.   Why in the world are we trying to make him stay in the Pocket.   When he runs he creates problems.  Even with a Spy you still cause problems.   His instinct is to run.  Let him run.  Our offense loosens up when he runs.   CAM loosens up when he runs.  

 

Stop trying to make him something he isn't.   Staying in the pocket to a point.   Go after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam Newton is steadily progressing as a QB, and DG will not trade him. He is a special talent.

 

I think a few posters are getting so wrapped up in the early success of Luck/Wilson/Kap/RG3, that they forgot Cam Newton was a raw project QB coming out. The other QBs are alot closer to their ceilings than Cam is right now. He is still figuring this QB thing out. Be patient Panthers fans, he is close.

 

Also, he isn't the only reason this team is losing. Stop watching ESPN, they only show highlights or lowlights. Watch an entire game of ATL, NO, even DEN and NE. And you will see a ton of "WTF was that" passes by those teams' golden pocket passers. This Panther TEAM needs to learn to win. And something needs to change for that to happen. Usually, the coach dictates those close wins. Rarely is it the QB. The team down in New Orleans is a good recent example.

 

I know everyone wants a playmaker at WR, but the quickest/cheapest way to improve this offense is to improve the oline. Which, probably could have been done this offseason. You already have the most expensive positions covered (C and LT), and the LG position was looking respectable with Amini. I think a good RG and RT would make all the difference with this offense. But I can't get too down on DG, he did take care of the glaring hole on the defense, DT. And in a big way. I think one more offseason, and we'll be fine.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, he isn't the only reason this team is losing. Stop watching ESPN, they only show highlights or lowlights. Watch an entire game of ATL, NO, even DEN and NE. And you will see a ton of "WTF was that" passes by those teams' golden pocket passers. This Panther TEAM needs to learn to win. And something needs to change for that to happen. Usually, the coach dictates those close wins. Rarely is it the QB. The team down in New Orleans is a good recent example.

 

You make a great point about the Saints being a perfect illustration of how important coaching is to a team.  Even with the All Mighty Mole, the Saints were a crap team last year.  The year before and now this year they're kicking ass and taking names.  Someone would REALLY have to be wearing their blinders not to see that if even the Mole needs good coaching to be successful, expecting Cam to lead this team to winning records and playoffs with the shitstorm of a coaching staff we have is absurd.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettlemen recognizes what a POS Coaching staff is currently in Charlotte. (Hopefully)

When Getts installs his own staff next year he'll be able to evaluate Cam properly and make a decision on his future.

And Kat Scrratch Reeder? :lolu:

This is another article to add to their HOF.

Select the first link:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Why+Drafting+Luke+Kuechly+Would+be+a+Mistake&oq=Why+Drafting+Luke+Kuechly+Would+be+a+Mistake&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i65.1916j0j8&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8

Dave Gettlemen is the most overrated thing since the 2011 Chudzinski

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised to see Cam traded for several picks in the off-season. I just don't think GMan thinks the team can win long term with him. We all will see a completely new look to the team if GMan gets his way. New coaching crew, new QB, and a bunch of draft picks are what's in his long term plan. This will also be Smittys last season in a Carolina uniform I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...