Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Ram fans are saying


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

This weeks humor and disrespect is brought to you by Ramsondemand.com. I joined the site and am trying to engage in friendly talk, but so far I've been informed that we aren't as good as the Rams because of the competition we've played, circumstances, blah, blah, blah.

 

Anyway, so far they're a civil bunch and have a lot in common with us. Our teams are similar and the fan bases seem to be as well.

 

Here are a few blumbs I found interesting.

 

 

Seattle sucks on the road, Spiller has been hobbled by knee and ankle injuries (he left the game week 2 with a knee injury), and Peterson had 60 yards on 10 carries, playing 2 days after his son died + still had 6 YPC with a terrible QB starting QB. That's good but that's not Great either. Peterson is not 'shutdown' if he's averaging 6 yards a carry, that's his team doing it to him...

I'm not going to claim we shut down arian foster - but i will point out they will losing the entire game. You can almost pretty much concede the run when up by 3 scores or more than 2 possessions late in the game.

I still believe our d-line is better - I like your studly 2 DT's, but I don't see any strong pass rushing depth..Not only do we have Quinn AND Long, but we also have Hayes (8 sacks last year as 3rd rotational DE)..

and yea, you guys can definitely be thrown on - 27th against the pass

 

 

 

I don't know that much about the Panthers. Like who their top draft picks are. At least they knew we have Austin.

 

 

 

This is how I'd call it:
QB - Push
HB/FB - Carolina
WR/TE - Push
OL - Push
DL - Push
LB - Carolina
DB - Rams

K/P - Rams
ST - Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

LOL, I know right!  Those people in the "queen city" get a little out of touch from time to time.  Reality check time come Sunday!

 

 

So, if you join please be civil. I don't want to get booted because some of you idiots can maintain an intelligent conversation. However, I do hope to see some others jump in and join the fray.

 

http://www.ramsondemand.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17276

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Rams numbers against the Texans.

Total First Downs

Rams 15 Texans 27

Total Plays

Rams 41 Texans 73

Total Yards

Rams 216 Texans 420

Total Time of Poss.

Rams 24:50 Texans 35:10

Total Turnovers

Rams 0 Texans 4

When looking at our blow out against the Vikings against their blow out agaist thg Texans, its clear their is a stark difference in our favor. Rams got blown out 31-7 against the Falcons and the Falcons D is horrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rams have some talent, especially on defense. I just don't trust their offense at all. 

 

20th in passing yards, 28th in rushing. Even though they put up decent scoring numbers last week for instance, I believe at least 14 of those points came from kickoff fumble return and the pick 6. 

 

If we win the turnover battle, we win. Simple as that IMO.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...