Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Fabiano, Are you even trying?

CatfanMO

By CatfanMO,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CatfanMO Rookie

CatfanMO

Posted
Posted

Ok, So Im looking through his list of Start em or Sit em for this week. I look through the QBs, No Cam Newton. Well Im starting him anyways as I think he is starting to play better. So RBs, No Panthers. WRs, No Panthers. RB and WRs I can kind of understand. So I look at the defense tab just knowing Carolina is a start em....NOPE. You would think a documented top 5 defense playing a rook QB and RB, would be an automatic start. COME ON MAN! There was just no mention of the panthers anywhere.

 

http://www.nfl.com/fantasyfootball/story/0ap2000000268075/article/start-em-sit-em-quarterbacks-for-week-8

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatfanMO Rookie

CatfanMO

Posted
  • Author
Posted

even after he takes the time to explain why he picks who he picks, you still don't understand why?

 

remove the blind homer glasses and read it again.

 

He did not explain anythign about the panthers. I have been starting the Carolina D for weeks now. They are top 5 in scoring. Nothing else needs explained. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cary Kollins Experienced

Cary Kollins

Posted
Posted

"Obvious fantasy starters like Aaron Rodgers and Adrian Peterson will not be featured."

 

 

 

I think Cam qualifies as an obvious starter.  He is consistently ranked in the top 5 of fantasy quarterback projections.

 

 

Maybe even Carolina defense/ST is an obvious start as well.

 

 

 

I think that article is more of a "guys on the fence" advice column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

He did not explain anythign about the panthers. I have been starting the Carolina D for weeks now. They are top 5 in scoring. Nothing else needs explained. 

 

it's obvious all you did was scan for anything panther related, and got upset when you didn't see anything obvious.

 

this may help you out...For your final lineup decisions, check our lineup rankings.

 

it's from the very same article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted

"Obvious fantasy starters like Aaron Rodgers and Adrian Peterson will not be featured."

I think Cam qualifies as an obvious starter. He is consistently ranked in the top 5 of fantasy quarterback projections.

Maybe even Carolina defense/ST is an obvious start as well.

I think that article is more of a "guys on the fence" advice column.

Get that common sense outta here!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raskle Contributor

Raskle

Posted
Posted

Actually.. he did mention a Panthers WR: Smitty

 

Owners beware - Steve Smith at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Thurs.): To put it lightly, Smith has not done well against the Buccaneers in recent seasons. He hasn't scored a touchdown against them in the last five meetings, and has posted 80-plus yards just once in his last eight games versus Tampa Bay. Smith could also see a lot of CB Darrelle Revis. (Maximum value: High WR3)

 

There ya go.. feel better now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bandu
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By bandu · Posted

      if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...