Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Women With Big Butts Are Smarter


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://pocho.com/study-women-with-big-butts-are-the-smartest/

 

video in the link...

 

 

 

“Marie Curie, for example, had to back that ass up in the lab all the time — and look how brilliant she was!” remarked butt researcher Benedict Pollen. “This supports the long-rumored story that Albert Einstein himself wore baggy clothing to try to mask the fact that he had it going on.”

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWzlnYpLlgI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tumblr_kpowqoR2Wn1qzma4ho1_400.jpg

 

 

assuming we're defining big butts as overweight, western social standards of beauty mean that overweight women are not as biologically fit (the scientific term for guys wanting to bang them) as their slimmer counterparts. in formative years educationally  (mandated schooling as well as university) given the way social cliques work in symbiosis with social standards of attractiveness, i think you could posit that to a degree - a small one at least - attractive people tend to do more social things (which leaves less time for doing intellectual things) whereas "unattractive" people may spend less time socializing with peers (allowing more time for intellectual pursuits.)

 

i worry this comes across as a "fatty fatty no friends" chant when reality dictates that an innumerable amount of variables are at play in something like this that make a concrete-encased uniformity or a law-like generalization impossible to adequately propose. however i think there's a case to be made that in some cases, for some people, it serves as an explanation.

 

other possible factors:

 

1) smart people are more self-confident people and therefore are more comfortable with not adapting to arbitrary social standards of beauty

 

2) if someone's intelligence correlates directly to their profession, the way they spend their time may have an effect on physical condition. a brilliant astrophysicist spending 70 hours a week in a lab may simply not have the time to hit the gym, whereas a waitress of average intelligence may have extra time to pursue that physical standard.

 

etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Who were we going to trade up with? The Dolphins wanted Proctor, the Rams were vehement on taking Ty Simpson, the Ravens wanted Ioane, and the Bucs werent trading with us except for maybe a kings ransom. Even if we wanted to move, we had no partner. Moot point.
    • Devin Lloyd is a stud lb but who is next to him? Prince and Nic should improve. Lee was super value but i am not counting this fourth round chicken yet. I would expect some improvement; hope to eat my words w/ a top ten D.  
    • I mean I agree about diminished Cam probably still being viable. Even though it gave a preview of how teams would defend the pass against a limited QB. There was an issue with the upcoming contract he was due to get and his expectations vs the new reality of his physical status - that people tend to  overlook when looking back on it  It had an effect on things I believe   But I do have to ask… what about Tepper’s second major move? fuging clueless   I mean I would take even an injured  Cam over Bryce all day long. 
×
×
  • Create New...