Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody concerned about Shula...


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

Nope.  Next man up if it happens.  Chud left and Shula has filled his shoes.  I was concerned about Shula going into the season and VERY concerned about him after starting off 1-3, but he's performed well.  But, let's not get carried away.  We're winning primarily because of our defense.  Our offense has been efficient and clutch, but not exactly lighting the world on fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no. no one will interview him unless we make a deep playoff run and look brilliant doing it.

 

if we have two good years in a row he might get an interview or two, maybe.

 

either way, we have 35958594 things on our radar before this.

Chud got hired and we were losing bad. I never could figure that out. Lovie Smith got fired and he won 10 games. There are some bad coaches and players that make big money, never have understood those contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are winning and I'm extremely happy about that.   Our offense has looked good on drives.   However  I've seen some play calls that have made me go WTF GTFO  more than  a few times, and lets be serious here, we are not winning because of our offense.   Sure we put up big numbers in a few games but that was to the defenses  credit as well with turnovers and field position.    We've not leaned on our O to carry us a  game this whole year, and honestly from what I've seen, with out Cams ability to extend drives with his legs we would have a 5-5 ish record right now.    Shula gets some credit but HC material?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula wouldn't get a head coach job unless he could bring Cam with him. Sure the offense is efficient and Shula has done a good job but lets be honest the offense is working because of Cam. This offense is designed around him and might not translate.

I figure Shula might get a shot one day. I just don't see it for a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2024 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
×
×
  • Create New...