Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we have a balanced offense?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I think that the past 3 weeks has made the offense appear to be less balanced. But good defenses do that, they make you pick your poison. New England sold out to take away the run game and made Cam beat them with his arm, while Miami and San Fran both have fantastic front sevens to defend the run and we had to take what we could get in the passing game and short yardage run game.

 

Call me crazy, but I would like to see Cam get more yardage in the air. We have been running all year, you would think that the play action game is prime to be revved up about now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that Rivera's idea of "balanced" was never about equal percentages of run and pass.

 

Rivera wanted an offense that was equally dangerous using both run and pass so that is a team took one away, we could burn them with the other.

 

Do we now fit that definition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams have figured out that we don't have a legit deep threat and they're stacking the hell out of the box to focus on shutting down our running game because they're not worried about getting beat deep.  But, our D keeps us in the game and Cam has been money in the clutch during this winning streak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams have figured out that we don't have a legit deep threat and they're stacking the hell out of the box to focus on shutting down our running game because they're not worried about getting beat deep.  But, our D keeps us in the game and Cam has been money in the clutch during this winning streak.

 

Neither Smitty nor Ginn is a legitimate deep threat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aren't we the 4th best rushing team?

 

IMO balanced doesn't mean you necessarily do both things equally statistically, but when necessary one facet of your team can make up for a deficit in the other. and this team has shown the ability to chuck the rock when things aren't going so well on the ground, or grind it out on the ground when the passing game is lacking.

 

we could always be better, but i'd say we're balanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aren't we the 4th best rushing team?

 

IMO balanced doesn't mean you necessarily do both things equally statistically, but when necessary one facet of your team can make up for a deficit in the other. and this team has shown the ability to chuck the rock when things aren't going so well on the ground, or grind it out on the ground when the passing game is lacking.

 

we could always be better, but i'd say we're balanced.

 

If you look back across our wins, are there games you would say we've won primarily on one or the other?

 

If so, how many of each?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...