Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Detroit, Dallas/Philadelphia, San Francisco, New Orleans


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Since we have a 90%+ chance of getting either the 2 or 5 seeds, I was wondering which team you would most like to see us play in our first game. I'm assuming we get the 2 seed for this so we'll get one of these teams at home. Rank them in order from the team you'd be happiest to play to least happy:

 

Dallas (I see absolutely no way this Dallas team could come into Charlotte and beat us) > Philadelphia (Don't think Foles gets it done in the postseason especially not against this defense, but hey, remember the preseason game) > Detroit (Inexperienced team, but I would dread seeing Calvin Johnson) > San Francisco (lots of playoff experience) > New Orleans (hard to beat a team 3x in the same season)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really want to play Dallas in the first round so we can get the pleasure of initiating the annual Cowboy meltdown. I'd like to see Dez fight one of his teammates and Romo crying in the post game presser. This would be a total victory. Second would be Detroit. I just feel they're soft and that Stafford would throw three picks. Third is New Orleans. This would be a tough game but I feel we'd handle em at home. Last is San Fran. They were dangerously close to beating us even with Kaep throwing for about 25 yards. I have a hard time believing they'd play that poorly on offense the second time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dallas>Detroit>Philly>NO>SF

 > Philadelphia (Don't think Foles gets it done in the postseason especially not against this defense, but hey, remember the preseason game)

 

That preseason game sticks out in my mind as well which is why I moved them past Detroit. It didn't mean anything, but our secondary was torched by both Philly QBs that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...