Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any Early Games We Should Have A Rooting Interest In?

TylerDurden

By TylerDurden,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

It sucks hairy donkey balls that I can't at least watch the Saints get destroyed by the Rams in the early games as they also play at 4pm (F U NFL). That being said, are there any early games we should carry about that would improve our playoff chances regardless of the scenario? I'm guessing we should be hoping the Bears and Niners both lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
swoonychic Newbie

swoonychic

Posted
Posted

Seattle is a given. I love to see any chinks in their armor since I fully expect our boys to meet them for the NFC Champ game.

 

But I'm also keeping an eye on Philly because they are in race with Dallas and we might end up playing one of them. I'd rather it be Dallas.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Morgan Grand Master

Captain Morgan

Posted
Posted

I'm actually pulling for the Falcons to win out.  Knocking them further down the draft ladder.

Don't want Clowney in our division.

 

Samething with the Bucs, not to mention we need more San Fran losses in our playoff picture.

 

Pulling for the Giants over Seattle, just to keep things interesting.

 

Pulling for the Browns over the Bears in case things get interesting the other way.

 

Vikes over the Eagles, although it's pretty much a given that Philly will win their division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WUnderhill
      Legette for Coleman?

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      That is a big HELL NO. As bad as XL was this season, at least he adds a dimension that the coaches can use for specific plays. Coleman is just as bad, yet adds zero diversity to our receiving corps. I’ll take the guy that at least cares enough to show up to meetings. Getting traded to a new team won’t change either of their work ethics.
    • kungfoodude
      I’m just not impressed with these hires/openings

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think there is any real reason to amend the rule. If you do, the teams will just find a way to abuse it. All the Browns have to do is just interview SOMEONE to "get through" the process. Hell, interview Jim Caldwell if that's what the actual goal is, just to get around it.  Also, they have all of the candidates required for the Rooney Rule in Aden Durde and Nate Scheelhaase. They are in full compliance already. Scheelhaase is already scheduled for a second interview, for that matter.
    • Khyber53
      Don't be greedy.

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I don't know about the stans but he's at times been like 60 percent of the offense on a playoff calibre team. He put up 1202 rushing yards and 10 touchdowns, then had effing 102 receptions for 924 yards and seven receiving touchdowns. He touched the ball 413 times this season (an average of 24 times per game.) Then you have to add in that he's a hell of a blocker when called upon. Without him, the injury depleted 49ers in a hot NFCWest division don't make the playoffs at all.  If that isn't the Most Valuable Player on the team then who should be? The idea that it is an award solely for QBs is just narrow. Edit to add: Will he win it? No. 
×
×
  • Create New...