Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Because you DEMANDED it, here are our 2014 opponents


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Or Gruden talking more about how "Cam still gives him nightmares".  Even though he never coached against him?

 

lol yeah, when Gruden's driving home at night he thinks about Cam and his spectacular plays.  In reality, he drives home at night thinking about the ho he just banged and that he probably shouldn't drive after eight whiskey sours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle @ Carolina three years in a row don't sound right?????

 

third time's a charm/win (for us, anyway.)

 

hopefully we'll be getting to play you guys in seattle for the NFC CG this year. just don't feel too bad when you guys miss out on your chance to go to the superbowl.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

third time's a charm/win (for us, anyway.)

hopefully we'll be getting to play you guys in seattle for the NFC CG this year. just don't feel too bad when you guys miss out on your chance to go to the superbowl.

Daaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmnnnnnnn!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those AFC home and away games aren't set in stone either. We played the Chargers 8 or so years ago in SD and then again last year in SD. It really depends on what the league wants to do. it SHOULD be alternated, but it isn't guaranteed to be. 

 

Hmmm....I can't find a single other instance where it hasn't been alternated, but you're right. We played San Diego on the road in 2008 and 2012, Denver at home in 2008 and 2012. I literally can't find another example of this though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why we get excited over schedule releases?  It's the same old teams.  Now if the schedule said we were going to play the Tokyo Macaques, that would be intriguing.  With that said, I want another shot at Wilson and those hawks, which it could come sooner than later. (Though I'm sure most of us don't want to go to Seattle in the playoffs, but it would be a great statement game)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle @ Carolina three years in a row don't sound right?????

 

Good point, but if the NFL does it like I said, it means we'll play the NFC West champs at home and the NFC East champs on the road. Also, next year we'll reset to the AFC and NFC North for the first time since realignment in 2002. That year, we played the NFC West team at home and the NFC East team on the road. Either way you look at it, what I originally put holds true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why we get excited over schedule releases?  It's the same old teams.  Now if the schedule said we were going to play the Tokyo Macaques, that would be intriguing.  With that said, I want another shot at Wilson and those hawks, which it could come sooner than later. (Though I'm sure most of us don't want to go to Seattle in the playoffs, but it would be a great statement game)

 

It's not even a schedule release. The teams are set years in advance.

 

 http://www.johnnyroadtrip.com/schedules/nfl_future_nfcs.htm

 

But I like them anyway.

 

I bet we crush Jacksonville at home in 2019

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...