Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question about the TV coverage for the Jets game


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

I got the impression from watching the game that at least the one guy (the guy who complimented Donald on his catch in traffic) had watched quite a bit of our games. He seemed content to spend the entire game calling out individuals for their performance in relation to previous games. I don't doubt his comments on LA stemmed from previous game film.

 

Other than that, I enjoyed their constant questioning of Holmes and the position he put himself in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Dierdorf is really, really old. So, it goes without saying that he's not going to remember every single player's name, jersey number, etc. He did alright, but he's been known to not be very good. Gumble is meh. They did seem to at least have watched Panthers games before, which was nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Dierdorf is really, really old. So, it goes without saying that he's not going to remember every single player's name, jersey number, etc. He did alright, but he's been known to not be very good. Gumble is meh. They did seem to at least have watched Panthers games before, which was nice.

 

lol....Dan is 64 yrs old.  That may have been really, really, old about 1900, but not now.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Dierdorf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't hear the commentary but I think CBS is way better than Fox in all aspects of coverage.

The picture even looks better.

I couldnt agree more. It wasnt long ago that Fox was by far the best but they have gotten lazy and CBS's production is miles ahead now.

And yeah CBS's picture is much sharper without a doubt. I noticed it immediately when I switched it over to the Saints/Rams game, I thought my eyes were going fuzzy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you can hear more of the crowd on the FOX broadcasts. I kept texting my daughter to yell louder because the  crowd didn't sound loud on the tv. She said everyone was standing and yelling loud lol.

 

Except for the Billick broadcasts (because I like the way he points things out & explains more of what the coach was probably thinking), I prefer the CBS broadcasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wondering how it went since this was a CBS....AFC crew.  Did they sound as if the knew anything about the Panthers beyond a couple of stats they read the day before?

 

 

 

By the way....anyone know if Billick is doing next week's game?  We need him.

 

We'll probably get Billick for the Falcons game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
    • If you pay Bryce $50M a year you greatly limit your ability to put the type of team around him you need to have to have a chance to win. THAT is the problem. Hell, we can't win with him on a rookie contract. How the hell are we supposed to start winning with him paying him like a franchise QB and having to make tough roster decisions to accommodate his cap hit? 
×
×
  • Create New...