Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should I be worried?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

So you think he would force her?

 

 

Brother if you think dude might sexually assault your girl you should beat his ass anyway.

 

 

If you mean you think he might start trying to mack on her then again I'd ask, do you trust her?

 

I don't think he'd force her.  I don't know him all that well but he doesn't seem like that kinda guy plus besides the car ride they'll be around a bunch of other people.  I can almost guarantee he is going to mack on her and I do trust her but, doesn't stop be from worrying.  I plan on talking to her about it tonight and seeing how that goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just take the passive aggressive route.

Go buy some of those "flavor enhancer" syrups from a sex shop.

Hold it up and say, with a big cheesy smile, "look what I have for Wilmington! Giggle giggle giggle"

Then give her another one and say "here, so you can test it out on your trip to raleigh"

I guarantee she will cancel that leg of the trip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am wondering if a ride with an old lover for conveinience sake is worth all the worry it is causing you.

 

Guys be devious and stuff.  He might see it as a chance to hit it and maybe he might not.  Was he your friend at one time?  Does he care about how you would feel?

 

Either way, it seems there is some doubt on your part.  If you trust her, fine, it wil all be ok.  If you have doubt, maybe there is a reason for that.

 

Look at it from a third party point of view.

 

How would you feel if it was me giving the ride?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not some loyalty exercise. You don't have to prove to yourself or anyone else that you trust her by letting her catch a ride with someone with whom she's got a shady past. If it bothers you, it bothers you and you should say something.

 

No, it's not normal procedure for a woman you're dating to casually tell you she's going to hitch a ride somewhere with a guy she's fuged in the past. If she doesn't get why that's a problem, then you're with the wrong woman.

 

In a perfect world you could trust your girlfriend in that situation. However in a perfect world, she wouldn't put herself in that situation to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiss her on the forehead and you'll have her forever.

 

You are so wrong :lol:

 

As to the topic, hate to say it but honestly, if you can't trust her, you haven't got much of a basis for anything.

 

if she's uncertain about your relationship at all, holding on tighter could push her away.

 

I'm reminded of a buddy of mine who asked a friend of his (no, not me) to 'look after' a girl he loved while he was away.  Three guesses how that story ended :( 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not some loyalty exercise. You don't have to prove to yourself or anyone else that you trust her by letting her catch a ride with someone with whom she's got a shady past. If it bothers you, it bothers you and you should say something.

 

No, it's not normal procedure for a woman you're dating to casually tell you she's going to hitch a ride somewhere with a guy she's fuged in the past. If she doesn't get why that's a problem, then you're with the wrong woman.

 

In a perfect world you could trust your girlfriend in that situation. However in a perfect world, she wouldn't put herself in that situation to begin with.

 

No, it's not normal procedure for a woman you're dating to casually tell you she's going to hitch a ride somewhere with a guy she's fuged in the past. If she doesn't get why that's a problem, then you're with the wrong woman.

 

This. Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...