Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 seed vs. saints missing the playoffs

nosuchthingasapanther

By nosuchthingasapanther,
in Carolina Panthers

#1 seed vs. saints missing playoffs  

208 members have voted

  1. 1. would you rather the panthers be the #1 seed, or the saints miss the playoffs

    • #1 seed
      157
    • no playoffs for the saints
      51

Recommended Posts

Shufdog Community Regular

Shufdog

Posted
Posted

That's a tough one, but I went with the Saints missing the playoffs. The way I see it... we're already doing better than anyone thought we would. If we go one and done in the playoffs so be it, we weren't even supposed to be there anyway. This year is a success in my eyes. fug the Saints!!! We're on the way up and they're on the way down!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

That's a tough one, but I went with the Saints missing the playoffs. The way I see it... we're already doing better than anyone thought we would. If we go one and done in the playoffs so be it, we weren't even supposed to be there anyway. This year is a success in my eyes. fug the Saints!!! We're on the way up and they're on the way down!!

Anything less than a Super Bowl victory is a failure. To be satisfied with less is a remarkably defeatist attitude and a hallmark sign of somebody who is happy with just seeing the Panthers play and giddy about the prospect of doing okay.

This team can go all the way. This is our year if we reach out and take it. Anything less is a failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

Comments like that are exactly why posters who hold the organization to the reasonable standard of being a winning one believe that posters who rabidly defend the team during down years have been brainwashed by the organization into being complacent with losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      panthers offense 30 of 32 in yards per play

      By strato · Posted

      I hope you understand that this Anti Bryce thing as you call it is really a pro Panthers thing. I think I can safely use we. We want the best for the Panthers.  As far as this other post saying ‘Anti’ Bryce people do misinformation.. you mean like going all in on “Renfro should have caught” that poorly thrown ball? I guess it was week 1. And calling it a drop. Comical btw.  I wonder, did you call that out or let it slide because it aligned with your agenda? 
    • strato
      Not to early to talk 2026 Hall of Fame nominees

      By strato · Posted

      These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.   I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot.  But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 
    • OneBadCat
      Not to early to talk 2026 Hall of Fame nominees

      By OneBadCat · Posted

      Smith is clear cut HOF if you judge what he did by reception. Fitzgerald was a stat padder.    The most Steve Smith was ever targeted in his career was in 2005 (150 targets). The same year he wins the triple crown.    Larry Fitzgerald was targeted more than 150 times over 9 separate seasons. Not once eclipsing 1500 yards in a season.    The over glazing of Larry Fitzgerald going around is way over blown. ARZ was top 10 in passing attempts nearly his entire prime. Steve Smith and Andre Johnson had it far worse and would have surpassed his #s in the same situation.
×
×
  • Create New...