Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL.com's QB Index


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

If you watch Luck play he does some really really stupid things. He is definitely a good player but some people try to act like he's some Stanford genius, he's not.

 

In one thread I see "Luck has way better weapons than Cam" in another thread I see "Luck has no weapons". To me the weapons card is overplayed. Some Quarterbacks need weapons to play well, other Quarterbacks make their weapons play well. Peyton Manning has always had great receivers, maybe it's because of Peyton and not the receivers. He made Pierre Garcon a good player. I was never that impressed with the WRs from Green Bay. If you have an amazing QB and a good system you are going to score some TDs.Greg Jennings looks mediocre in Minnesota  (granted he's older).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Luck and Cam are virtually the same type of passer. Newton, of course, is more athletic. The difference between them is one has been groomed to 'replace' a future HOFer and the other has been presented in a negative light before even taking a snap.

Cam has a bigger arm and is stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest difference between the two? Luck was annointed before he was drafted, therefore he will not be torn down without overwhelming evidence that he is a bust. Highly unlikely.

Cam was not expected to become a successful NFL quarterback, but instead a college athlete playing a style that wouldn't translate and was gimmicky.

It will always be easier to support the Luck narrative then the Cam narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest difference between the two? Luck was annointed before he was drafted, therefore he will not be torn down without overwhelming evidence that he is a bust. Highly unlikely.

Cam was not  DESIRED to become a successful NFL quarterback, but instead a college athlete playing a style that wouldn't translate and was gimmicky.

It will always be easier to support the Luck narrative then the Cam narrative.

 

Fixed. 

 

Cause all the other scouts and legitimate scouting firms saw and heard what the Panthers did when they looked into Newton. 

 

The General media/broadcasters, just refused to objectively look at Cam, though the scouting firms and team departments knew he was legit, just as the Panthers did (whether media types bothered to look or listen to the scouts/scouting services or not). Trust me. They knew Cam was the Real Deal!

 

And I certainly agree on, what you said about Luck, and the media treatment of him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont care to get into the Cam Vs Luck debate because I respect both players, but I will say LOL at any analyst who heralded Luck as the next Manning. Even when comparing their early seasons, the two couldnt be more different players from one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam is ever rated higher than Luck by anyone, the blow to the collective egos and credibility of so many people will be damaged.  The line is drawn with Luck, whom they anointed as the next HOF great, and Cam who was the next Jamarcus Russel/Vince Young.  Once Cam is ranked higher, there is a double whammy of ego blows, one that they were wrong about Luck, and two, that they were wrong about Cam.   

 

To me, if Cam is even in the conversation then he's winning, and that's enough for me.  We can see how good our QB is.  It's like the tearing down and crumbling of the Berlin Wall, Cam is chipping away, and once it's torn down many people will fall with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam is ever rated higher than Luck by anyone, the blow to the collective egos and credibility of so many people will be damaged.  The line is drawn with Luck, whom they anointed as the next HOF great, and Cam who was the next Jamarcus Russel/Vince Young.  Once Cam is ranked higher, there is a double whammy of ego blows, one that they were wrong about Luck, and two, that they were wrong about Cam.   

 

To me, if Cam is even in the conversation then he's winning, and that's enough for me.  We can see how good our QB is.  It's like the tearing down and crumbling of the Berlin Wall, Cam is chipping away, and once it's torn down many people will fall with it. 

 

Cam was actually rated very high coming out of college by legitimate scouting services. The two major questions people had about his character and college system, were easily answered by just digging a little deeper (thorough back ground checks/interviews and film breakdown), as Carolina, and other scouting services/publications/NFL departments did.

 

Nonetheless, the MEDIA (not NFL SCOUTING DEPARTMENTS), kept pushing the uncertainty stuff regarding Cam, while he was already decided to be the first pick by early spring of 2011, months before the draft. 

 

Yes, and even now (as you're stating), many in the media don't want to give Cam his due, cause they just didn't want to like him, and/or believed the nonsense that was easily dis-proven with some cursory research (as now). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosenthal just can't give up on his Luck love (though he's good at giving Cam the credit he is due)...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me see here... Cam has a higher QB rating than Luck?

 

Check.

 

Cam has a higher yards per attempt than Luck? 

 

Check.

 

Cam has more TDs scored than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And (using last years NFL "expert" criteria) Cam has more "wins" than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And, just guessing here (and using yet another of last year's NFL "expert" criteria), but I think Cam has more "clutch" "comeback" wins this year than Luck?

 

But Luck is the better QB?

 

OK.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000304038/article/quarterback-index-yearend-rankings

I keep telling you folks today's media suffers from Belief Perseverance. The desire to hold unto their own concept even in the face of discredited proof.

 

Luck is their chosen QB and unless he falls flat on his face he will be hyped as better than the other QBs no matter how much better than him they perform. As a matter of fact, don't be surprised if those who insist on pushing Luck start imposing the weaknesses of Luck unto Cam like they did when Stafford, their 2010 chosen QB. When he had his second year slump, they turned around and imposed it unto Cam's second season despite Cam playing about as good as he did his first season and the team won one more game than the season before. And that was also despite the Defense still struggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam was actually rated very high coming out of college by legitimate scouting services. The two major questions people had about his character and college system, were easily answered by just digging a little deeper (thorough back ground checks/interviews and film breakdown), as Carolina, and other scouting services/publications/NFL departments did.

 

Nonetheless, the MEDIA (not NFL SCOUTING DEPARTMENTS), kept pushing the uncertainty stuff regarding Cam, while he was already decided to be the first pick by early spring of 2011, months before the draft. 

 

Yes, and even now (as you're stating), many in the media don't want to give Cam his due, cause they just didn't want to like him, and/or believed the nonsense that was easily dis-proven with some cursory research (as now). 

 

it's funny because the media forced the Panthers to really do a thorough background check on Cam. Better than any other top drafted player, I am sure to this day. I think Rivera said he went as far back to Blinn and University of Florida.

 

I think they even checked to see how many parking tickets Cam had, until they realized he own a scooter..LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...