Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2yr Gamble

rippadonn

By rippadonn,
in Carolina Panthers

Would you sign Gamble to a two year deal?  

60 members have voted

  1. 1. 2yr Gamble?


Recommended Posts

Fan01 Enthusiast

Fan01

Posted
Posted

Since we need help at WR, has anyone thought to ask Jerry Richardson to play?  He's got experience and played with some of the greats.  Ryan Vermillion could keeps checking on his heart so there's no problem there although I don't know what his 40 time is these days.

 

Jerry and Smitty already have a bond so there is already great team chemistry there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
  • Author
Posted

1.it's the offseason. Welcome

2. I forgot about the shoulder

3. If he could pass a physical and if he is still a football player( only on year removed), I wouldn't turn him away if he pulled up at BOA "healthy".

He never had a history of injury.

4. Some of you are twerps!

5. The question is: If he decided to come back having been one year removed would you take him.

6. Bringing up people who played 50yrs ago would be foolish. A guy deciding to lace em up one more time isn't. Look at #45. Would you turn the guy away if he passed a physical?

WELCOME TO THE OFFSEASON CHUMPS! not all of you... Some of you

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Gamble was garbage before..what makes you think he'd be good now after he's had a year on the couch?

I think you are mistaken. They often threw away from his side and challenged 41 more when he was here. He played at a high level for years, not too many big mistakes aside from the Viking game.

Solid corner who we could have used this year if that shoulder held up. Cap casualty more than injury retirement at the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
  • Author
Posted

we weren't any better when he was on the field and we weren't any worse when he wasn't.

and....i'm not sure if anyone mentioned this yet but...HE's RETIRED!

I just don't remember the guy getting exploited like a couple guys we got now. He was not the true weakness in the secondary. Still had a little tread left aside from the shoulder.

Sorry the question hurt some feelings or sensibilities. If someone who could possibly help you came to the door would you choose a possibly more expensive option? The guys we got now aren't ready for the spotlight. A top CB is an expensive fix via FA. Using a high draft pick on a CB means no really good #1WR.

It was just a question sorry to offend you sir. Check no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Looking Way Ahead, But.

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I didn't say I thought throwing it was a bad decision, I said I thought not running those 3-5 yard routes to pick up the 1st down wasn't a great call.  Yes the play worked out, but I didn't love the play call, it's like when a bad shooter is taking a 3 and you're yelling "no no no" as they're going up and then they make it so it worked out. That's still gambling on them to make the play and I take no issue with that. But I just went and watched the play again, we had T-Mac and XL running downfield crossing routes, Coker went in motion behind the LOS and then moved up a yard or two after the snap but not even past the LOS, Sanders chipped the DE and then ran a drag route right long the LOS. The play worked out, but I don't really like that particular play call and route tree with the game on the line on a 4th and 2.  If you want to send one route downfield as an option that's fine, but there were only 2 realistic target options with that route tree and they were both 15-20 yards downfield.
    • Basbear
      Chuba is a better back than Rico.

      By Basbear · Posted

      If BY comes back, they 100% need to bring in legit competition.    Heres what as you are alluding too. This team can either sign Icky&Mays or BY, I do not see both without cuts/trades/etc. My vote is for Icky&Mays, draft a QB....  
    • CRA
      Chuba is a better back than Rico.

      By CRA · Posted

      JB shouldn’t even be a thought IMO.  Bonus if he ever matters for us.  
×
×
  • Create New...